-A ISBN TTfl-TflB-EDflfl-ai-fl 9"789832"088318 R U B B E R P L A N T A T I O N & P r o c e s s i n g T e c h n o l o g i e s R u b b e r P l a n t a t i o n a n d P r o c e s s i n g T e c h n o l o g i e s i w w w . l g m . g o v . m y Publisher Malaysian Rubber Board (MRB) (A Statutory Agency under the Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities) Tingkat 17 & 18, Bangunan Getah Asli, 148, Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Tel: 603-9206 2000 Email: general@lgm.gov.my Copyright © Malaysia Rubber Board No part of this publication may be produced in any form or any means electronic or mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. First Edition 2009 Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloging-in-publication Data Rubber plantation & processing technologies Include index Bibliography: p395-401 ISBN 978-983-2088-31-8 1. Rubber—History 2. Rubber plantation 633.8952 F O R E W O R D Malaysia's success in the natural rubber industry, among other things, has been mainly attributed to the strong support of R & D, good management, the availability of trained personnel and also the industrious workforce. In the early years, Malaysia was only known as the leading natural rubber producer, but now, Malaysia has also been acknowledged as a leader in the export of quality rubber products. Although the rapid industrialisation taking place in the country has somewhat obscured the role of the agriculture, rubber still holds a niche in the growing Malaysian economy. Whilst it is true that rubber areas are reducing, one will see that the number of factories for the manufacture of rubber goods is steadily increasing in tandem with industrial development; and becoming more and more important. The RUBBER PLANTATION AND PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES has been written with the sole aim to provide information and to serve as a text book on rubber for purposes of reference and practical utility. It is hoped that this integrated and self- contained book will meet a long felt need among students and exponents of the art and science of rubber production. Scientists and students interested in the natural rubber industry will also greatly benefit by becoming acquainted with the various activities and practices governing the production of rubber. This book has been based on currently available information and it has made extensive use of the immense experience of the scientists gained throughout the years while they were in service with the Malaysian Rubber Board (MRB). Undoubtedly, this book will be invaluable to all those who are directly or indirectly involved in the rubber plantation sector. It is well documented with easy-to- read diagrams, charts and photographs, and is also useful as a reference to those who are in the extension service and personnel dealing with the production of rubber. Books on natural rubber, inspite of its colourful and long history, are still considered few, and I strongly believe that this publication is aptly an addition that will share its days of glory both in the past and in the present. Last but not least I would like to congratulate the excellent job and tireless efforts of the team headed by the Director of Extension & Development Division who were entrusted with the task of adapting two earlier books written in Bahasa Malaysia and thereafter compiling the book. Dato' Dr Kamarul Baharain bin Basir Director General Malaysian Rubber Board ii P R E F A C E Rubber planting in Malaysia has been and will continue to be an important agricultural undertaking. It is still needed to accommodate those who are already involved in this venture. Malaysia is not only a major producer, but also an important consumer of natural rubber. Moreover, during the last two decades Malaysia has been the centre for rubber technology generation. It is therefore justifiable as well as appropriate for Malaysia to continue planting and producing rubber. However, the planting industry must be further updated and modernised. Early crop maturity and maximising yield must be the main aim now. This means that the adoption of technologies particularly by the smallholders who form the backbone of the rubber production sector is continuously utilised and sustained. The natural rubber industry in Malaysia will continue to be one of the major contributors to the national economy and a source of pride for those directly involved in the industry, particularly, the smallholders and rubber planters. This book is a revised adaptation of the two books written in Bahasa Malaysia entiled "Teknologi Getah Asli" and " Teknologi Perladangan dan Pemprosesan Getah" published in 1985 and 1994, respectively. It contains applicable technologies on rubber currently recommended and practised. There are ten chapters in all, out of which nine are technical. The first chapter provides an overview of the world natural rubber industry and an introduction to the Malaysian rubber industry. There are three sections consisting of glossary of terminologies found in this book, measurements and symbols. In the presentation of this book, materials have been drawn from several other RRIM/MRB publications. To these writers we wish to offer our deepest gratitude. Most significantly the contributions from the scientists, specialists in their respective fields, are readily acknowledged and appreciated. In a work of this kind it is impossible to enumerate all those who provided advice or assistance. It will, however, be remiss not to acknowledge the admirable achievement of the team who were given the task of compiling this book and editorial advice given by Puan Rabeatun Awaliah Awalludin, Head of Publications and Library Unit. Thanks are also due to Dr. Mohd Akbar Md. Said, MRB Deputy Director General (Research & Innovation) for the time and trouble he has taken to read through the manuscript and for his invaluable suggestions and ideas in improving the compilation of this book. Our great appreciation to the following for their contributions in making this publication possible: Tn Haji Abu Bakar bin Haji Ahmad (Original idea and draft), iii Dr. Othman bin Hashim (Coordinator), Pn V. Vanaja (Coordinator), Pn Masitah binti Arsad (Editing and Publishing), En Abd Latif bin Dalib (Administration), En Shahrir bin Mohd Salleh (Administration), En Azmi bin Din (Photography), En Ahmad Fadzil bin Ahmad Faiz (Typesetting), En Norzaid bin Kamarudin (Design input), En Azril Azmil bin Kamaluddin (Cover Design), Pn Haslira binti Khalid (Text Input), Unit Heads, Senior Officers and Staff of MRB (Inputs and updates). Finally, our thanks to Dato' Dr. Kamarul Baharain Basir, Director General of the MRB, for his permission to publish and for writing its foreword. We dedicate this book to all those who are involved in developing and upholding the rubber industry until the present time. They may be planters, smallholders, extension agents, supervision personnel and others. We urge and hope all of you will carry on the good work that you have put up thus far. With your commitment and concerted efforts the Malaysian natural rubber industry will continue to survive and be viable as a major contributor to the national economy for many years to come. Tuan Mohamad Tuan Muda Director Extension & Development Division iv C O N T E N T S Foreword i Preface iii List of Tables v List of Figures ix Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Brief History 1 World Rubber Industry 2 Malaysia NR Industry 3 Industry Outlook 12 Chapter 2 DEVELOPMENT OF RUBBER CLONES 21 Propagation of Rubber 24 Planting Recommendations 29 Seedlings 43 Clonal Seed 43 Rubber Seed and Its Germination 48 Nurseries and the Production of Planting Materials 51 Root Induction 67 Chapter 3 SOILS AND LAND PREPARATION 69 Soil Conservation 82 Terracing 87 Ground Cover Crops 89 Chapter 4 PLANTATION DEVELOPMENT 97 Work Operation 97 Rubber Planting Design 111 Field Lining 115 Planting Perimeter Fencing 120 Planting Hole 121 Chapter 5 RUBBER PLANTING AND MIXED CROPPING 123 Planting 123 Mulching 127 Mixed cropping 129 Point Plan 136 Chapter 6 FERTILISER APPLICATION AND FIELD MAINTENANCE 139 Fertiliser and Its Function 139 Replacement and Thinning Out 158 Prunning 159 Branch Induction 165 Repairs and General Maintenance 170 Tree Gowth Census 171 Chapter 7 WEEDS AND THEIR CONTROL 173 Chapter 8 TREATMENT OF MALADIES AND INJURIES AND CONTROL OF PESTS 185 Root Diseases 185 Stem Diseases 192 Leaf Diseases 204 Physical Injuries 211 Pests 220 Chapter 9 LATEX HARVESTING 247 Tapping 247 Exploitation Symbols 265 Latex Yield Stimulation 270 Ethephon-based Stimulant, MORTEX 276 REACTORRIM Stimulation Technique 278 RRIMFLOW Stimulation Technique 284 Controlled Upward Tapping 297 Tasking and Retasking 301 Tapping Systems 303 Exploitation Schedules 305 Tapping Management 312 Chapter 10 NATURAL RUBBER PROCESSING 315 Cleanliness in Processing 316 Preservation of Latex 318 Dry Rubber Content in Latex 322 Microwave Rapid Method for Determining Dry Rubber Content of Cuplumps 327 Production of USS 330 Smokehouse and the Drying of USS 340 Grading of RSS 346 Production of Block Rubber 352 Production of Latex Concentrates 355 Glossary 363 Symbols 385 Measurements 389 References 393 Index 397 L I S T O F T A B L E S Table Page 1.1 WORLD RUBBER PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION ('000 TONNES) 2000-2007 3 1.2 AREA UNDER RUBBER IN MALAYSIA, THAILAND, INDONESIA, INDIA AND 4 VIETNAM ('000 HA) 1.3 PLANTED HECTARAGE OF NATURAL RUBBER ON ESTATES AND 5 SMALLHOLDINGS IN MALAYSIA ('000 HA) 1.4 NR PRODUCTION OF MAJOR NR PRODUCING COUNTRIES ('000 TONNES) 6 1.5 MALAYSIA'S NATURAL RUBBER PRODUCTION AND YIELD 6 1.6 MALAYSIA'S RUBBER CONSUMPTION BY TYPE (TONNES) 8 1.7 EXPORT VALUE CONTRIBUTION OF THE MALAYSIAN NR INDUSTRY 9 1.8 EXPORT OF RUBBER PRODUCTS BY PRODUCT SECTOR 10 (VALUE IN RM MILLION) 1.9 IMPORTS OF RUBBER PRODUCT SECTOR (RM MILLION) 11 1.10 EXPORT VALUE CONTRIBUTION OF THE RUBBERWOOD PRODUCT 16 SUB-SECTOR 1.11 MALAYSIAN RUBBER DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES 17 2.1 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 1 LATEX-TIMBER CLONES 31 2.2 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 1 LATEX-TIMBER CLONES 31 2.3 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 1 LATEX-TIMBER CLONES 32 2.4 ESTIMATED WOOD VOLUME OF GROUP 1 LATEX-TIMBER CLONES 32 2.5 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 1 LATEX CLONES 33 2.6 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 1 LATEX CLONES 33 2.7 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 1 LATEX CLONES 34 2.8 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2A LATEX-TIMBER CLONES IN THE 35 LARGE SCALE CLONE TRIALS 2.9 MEAN GIRTH (CM) OF GROUP 2A LATEX -TIMBER CLONES IN THE LARGE 36 SCALE CLONE TRIALS 2.10 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 2A RRIM 2000 SERIES 36 LATEX -TIMBER CLONES 2.11 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 2A RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX -TIMBER 36 CLONES IN MONITORED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 2.12 ESTIMATED WOOD VOLUME FOR GROUP 2A LATEX-TIMBER CLONES 37 2.13 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2A LATEX CLONES IN THE LARGE 37 SCALE CLONES TRIALS 2.14 MEAN GIRTH (CM) OF GROUP 2A LATEX CLONES IN THE LARGE SCALE 38 CLONE TRIALS 2.15 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 2A LATEX CLONES OF 38 RRIM 2000 SERIES 2.16 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 2A LATEX CLONES OF RRIM 2000 SERIES IN 38 SMALL SCALE CLONE TRIALS 2.17 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES 39 LATEX -TIMBER CLONES IN THE LARGE SCALE CLONE TRIALS 2.18 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX-TIMBER 39 CLONES IN THE SMALL SCALE CLONE TRIALS v 2.19 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES 40 LATEX -TIMBER CLONES 2.20 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX -TIMBER 40 CLONES IN MONITORED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 2.21 ESTIMATED WOOD VOLUME FOR GROUP 2B LATEX-TIMBER CLONES 41 2.22 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX CLONES 42 IN THE SMALL SCALE CLONE TRIALS 2.23 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX CLONES 42 IN THE LARGE SCALE CLONE TRIALS 2.24 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF RECOMMENDED GROUP 2B RRIM 42 2000 SERIES LATEX CLONES 2.25 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX CLONES IN 43 SMALL SCALE CLONE TRIALS 2.26 COMMERCIAL YIELD IN KG/HA/YEAR OF RECOMMENDED SEEDLINGS 43 2.27 PERCENTAGE GERMINATION OF RUBBER SEEDS EXPOSED TO SUNLIGHT 49 2.28 EFFECT OF SIX ROOTSTOCKS ON GROWTH OF SCION 49 2.29 TEN YEARS SCION YIELD 50 2.30 SUGGESTED PLANTING DISTANCES IN RUBBER NURSERIES 54 2.31 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR BUDSTICK MULTIPLICATION NURSERY 57 2.32 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR BUDDED STUMP NURSERY 59 2.33 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR BUDDED STUMP IN POLYBAG NURSERY 59 2.34 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR YOUNG BUDDING NURSERY 61 2.35 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR CORE STUMP NURSERY 63 2.36 EFFECT OF IBA 2000 ROOT INDUCTION OF BUDDED STUMPS OF DIFFERENT 66 GIRTH SIZES 3.1 SOIL FRACTIONS AND THEIR DIAMETER SIZE LIMITS 73 3.2 SOME SOIL SERIES IN RUBBER-GROWING AREAS OF PENINSULAR 76-78 MALAYSIA 3.3 SOIL PRODUCTIVITY CLASSES 80 3.4 EFFECT OF COVER CROPS ON REDUCTION OF SOIL EROSION 85 3.5 PLANTING POINTS FOR 500 PLANTS PER HECTARE ON TERRACE 88 3.6 SOME COMMON LEGUME COVER PLANT SPECIES 90 3.7 EFFECT OF COVER CROPS ON SOIL EROSION 91 3.8 EFFECT OF COVERS ON FEEDER ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF RUBBER 91 3.9 NUTRIENTS RETURNED TO THE SOIL IN FIVE YEARS BY TWO TYPES OF 91 COVERS (KG/HA) 3.10 EFFECT OF COVERS ON GROWTH OF RUBBER FIVE YEARS AFTER 91 PLANTING (CM) 3.11 EFFECT OF COVERS ON THE IMMATURITY PERIOD OF RUBBER 92 3.12 EFFECT OF COVERS ON THE ACCUMULATED YIELD OF RUBBER (KG/HA) 92 3.13 LEGUME COVER CROP SEED MIXTURES (KG/HA) 93 4.1 SAMPLE WORK SCHEDULE FOR 2,000 HECTARES NEW PLANTING 100 4.2 SAMPLE WORK SCHEDULE FOR 50 HECTARES REPLANTING 100 4.3 RUBBER NEW PLANTING COST (RM/HA) 101 4.4 RUBBER REPLANTING COST (RM/HA) 102 vi 4.5 EFFECT OF DRAINAGE ON YIELD OF CLONE PB 86 ON SELANGOR SERIES 107 SOIL 4.6 PLANTATION DRAIN SPECIFICATIONS 108 4.7 RUBBER PLANTING DESIGN 112-113 5.1 EFFECT OF DEEP PLANTING ON GROWTH OF YOUNG BUDDINGS OF PB 255 (I) 126 5.2 EFFECT OF DEEP PLANTING ON GROWTH OF YOUNG BUDDINGS OF PB 255 (II) 126 5.3 EFFECT OF MULCHING ON FEEDER ROOT DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH OF 127 MAXI STUMP BUDDING CLONE RRIM 600 5.4 EFFECT OF VARIOUS TYPES OF MULCH ON GROWTH OF RRIM 600 127 5.5 SUGGESTED SIGNS FOR POINT PLAN RECORDINGS 137 6.1 EFFECT OF FERTILISER ON GROWTH OF TWENTY SEVEN MONTHS OLD 139 RUBBER 6.2 EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON YOUNG RUBBER ON SELANGOR SERIES SOIL 139 6.3 EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS ON GROWTH OF RUBBER 140 6.4 EFFECT OF UREA ON GIRTHING RATE OF RUBBER AT 160 CM HEIGHT 140 6.5 EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF PHOSPHATE ON GIRTHING RATE OF 140 RUBBER AT 160 CM HEIGHT 6.6 EFFECT OF FERTILISER ON BARK RENEWAL 141 6.7 PLANT NUTRIENTS 143 6.8 EXAMPLE OF STRAIGHT FERTILISERS 147 6.9 RRIM-FORMULATED MIXTURE FERTILISERS 148 6.10 SOME SLOW RELEASE FERTILISERS 149 6.11 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR IMMATURE RUBBER IN THE FIELD 153 6.12 GENERAL MANURING SCHEDULE FOR YOUNG RUBBER INLAND SOILS 154 6.13 INTERIM GENERAL MANURING SCHEDULE FOR YOUNG RUBBER ON INLAND 155 SOILS 6.14 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR YOUNG RUBBER ON COASTAL CLAY SOILS 155 6.15 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR REPLANTED MATURE RUBBER (KG/HA/YEAR) 156 6.16 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR MATURE REPLANTED RUBBER (KG/TREE/YEAR) 156 6.17 EFFECT OF CONTROLLED PRUNING ON GROWTH AND TAPPABILITY OF 159 RRIM 600 6.18 EFFECT OF CONTROLLED PRUNING ON TAPPABILITY AND YIELD 160 6.19 EFFECT OF BRANCH INDUCTION ON GROWTH OF FOURTEEN MONTHS OLD 166 TREES 6.20 EFFECT OF BRANCH INDUCTION ON TREE HEIGHT OF FOURTEEN MONTHS 166 OLD TREES 7.1 EFFECT OF WEED UNDERGROWTH ON GROWTH OF RUBBER 174 7.2 EFFECT OF WEEDS ON GROWTH OF RUBBER FIVE YEARS AFTER PLANTING 174 (GIRTH OF TREE IN CM) 7.3 EFFECT OF WEEDS ON IMMATURITY PERIOD OF RUBBER 174 7.4 WEED CONTROL ROUNDS BY HERBICIDE SPRAYING 176 7.5 TYPE OF HERBICIDES FOR YOUNG RUBBER AREA 177 7.6 TYPE OF HERBICIDES FOR MATURE RUBBER AREA 178 9.1 QUANTITY OF LATEX FLOW BY TIME OF TAPPING 250 9.2 RINGS OF LATEX VESSELS SEVERED BY DEPTH OF TAPPING 251 9.3 YEARLY BARK CONSUMPTION GUIDE 252 vii i 9.4 ADDITIONAL TAPPING DAYS AND YIELDS OBTAINED WITH THE USE OF 255 RRIMGUD 9.5 EFFECT OF ETHEPHON STIMULATION ON YIELD 271 9.6 THE PREPARATION OF LOW CONCENTRATION ETHEPHON 274 9.7 GUIDELINE FOR ETHEPHON STIMULATION 275 9.8 RECOMMENDATION OF MORTEXAPPLICATION 277 9.9 CLONAL RESPONSE ON YIELD FROM CONTROLLED UPWARD TAPPING 300 9.10 MAPA-NUPW TAPPING TASK SIZES 302 9.11 EXPLOITATION SYSTEM FOR BUDDINGS (I) 306 9.12 EXPLOITATION SYSTEM FOR BUDDINGS (II) 307 9.13 EXPLOITATION SYSTEM FOR BUDDINGS (III) 308 9.14 EXPLOITATION SYSTEM FOR BUDDINGS (IV) 309 9.15 EXPLOITATION SYSTEM FOR BUDDINGS (V) 310 9.16 EXPLOITATION SYSTEM FOR BUDDINGS (VI) 310 9.17 EXPLOITATION SYSTEM FOR CLONAL SEEDLINGS 311 10.1 HNS-AMMONIA PRESERVATIVE SYSTEM 319 10.2 HNS-AMMONIA STOCK SOLUTION 320 10.3 BORIC ACID-AMMONIA PRESERVATIVE SYSTEM 320 10.4 BORIC ACID-AMMONIA STOCK SOLUTION 320 10.5 TMTD-ZNO-AMMONIA PRESERVATIVE SYSTEM 321 10.6 TMTD-ZNO-AMMONIA STOCK SOLUTION 321 10.7 COMPOSITION OF LATEX 322 10.8 EFFECT OF SOME ADULTERANTS AND EXTERNAL TREATMENTS OF FIELD 327 LATEX ON METROLAC DRC 10.9 DILUTION OF FORMIC ACID 336 10.10 DCL-ALL-ALLUMINIUM LATEX COAGULATING TANKS 336 10.11 PRICE OF RSS (SEN/KG) 348 10.12 CHEMICALS USED IN BLOCK RUBBER (SMR) PRODUCTION (PERCENTAGE OF 352 DRC WEIGHT OF LATEX) 10.13 BLOCK SMR SPECIFICATIONS 356 10.14 PRESERVATIVE SYSTEMS FOR LATEX CONCENTRATES 358 10.15 BASIC TEST AND SPECIFICATION LIMITS OF CENTRIFUGED LATEX 359 CONCENTRATE 10.16 TEST ANALYSIS OF SKIM RUBBER 362 viii L I S T O F F I G U R E S Figure Page 2.1 Profile of a Perfect Tree 23 2.2 Hand Pollination Process 24 2.3 Green Budding Process 26 2.4 Young Budding Process 27-28 2.5 Flowchart Showing The Different Stages of Testing Different Type 29 of Clones 2.6 Schematic Shape of Seed Gardens-Square and Rectangular 44 2.7 Arrangement of Clones in Seed Garden 45-47 2.8 Various Sizes of Rubber Seeds from Different Clones 48 2.9 Germinating Rubber Seeds 51 2.10 Establishment of Polybag Nursery 53 2.11 Ground Nursery 54 2.12 Transplanting Budded Stumps Into Polybags 55 2.13 Preparing Core Stump Nursery 56 2.14 Producing Green Budsticks 58 2.15 Production of Budded Stumps 60 2.16 Polybags Budded Stump Nursery Where the Scion Shoots Have 61 Emerged to Two Hardened Whorls of Leaves and Ready for Transplanting 2.17 Manuring Young Budding Materials 62 2.18 Production of High Budding Materials 64 2.19 Production of Core Stumps 65 2.20 Effect of IBA on Root Development of Budded Stumps 67 3.1 A Typical Soil Profile 70 3.2 Soil Textural Classes Guide 74 3.3 Various Types of Soil Pebbler 75 3.4 Various Types of Soil Erosion 84 3.5 Contour Terracing and Bunding 85 3.6 Cross-Section of Terrace 87 3.7 Layout for Planting Point Adjustment Along Terrace 88 3.8 Plan of Legume Cover Crop Drills For Flat Land and Hill Slope 93 3.9 Planting Out Legume Cover Crop Seeds 94 3.10 Manuring Legume Cover Crops 95 4.1 Manually-Cleared Jungle Area for Rubber Cultivation 104 4.2 Clearing Old Rubber Area for Replanting 105 4.3 Zero Burning Replanting 106 4.4 Plan of Plantation Drainage 108 ix 4.5 Cambered Road Surface 110 4.6 Square Planting Design 116 4.7 Triangular Planting Design 117 4.8 Determining the Inter-Contour Distance on a Hill Slope 117 4.9 Contour Lining A Hilly Area-A Plan of the Contoured Hill and Cross- 119 Section of the Same Hill 4.10 Contour Lining Equipment 120 4.11 Preparing Planting Holes 122 5.1 Planting Polybag Material 124-125 5.2 Lalang (Brass (Imperata Cylindrica) Used as Mulching Materials 128 5.3 Various Types of Mixed Cropping 129-130 5.4 Various Mixed Crop Planting Designs 131-134 5.5 Different Types of Hedge Planting 135 5.6 A Sample Point Plan of a Rubber Plot 137 6.1 Major Nutrient Deficiency Symptoms in Rubber Leaves (First leaf 145-146 from the left is not deficient) 6.2 Fertiliser Application for Young Rubber Trees Less Than 15 Months 150 (Circle Broadcasting) 6.3 Diagram Showing Method of Fertiliser Application on Young 151 Rubber 6.4 Diagram Showing Placement of Fertiliser Application on Mature 151 Rubber Trees 6.5 Application of Fertiliser for Immature and Mature Trees 152 6.6 Nutrient Cycle in the Rubber Plantations 157 6.7 Example of Corrective Prunings 161 6.8 Various Types of Controlled Pruning 162-164 6.9 Pruning Technique 164 6.10 Effect of Branching on the Rubber Tree 166 6.11 Inducing Branches 167-169 7.1 Several Noxious Weed Species 178-179 7.2 Knapsack Sprayers of 18 Litres Capacity-Brass and PVC 180 7.3 Various Types of Nozzle 181 7.4 Herbicide Spraying Along Planting Strips 182 7.5 Planting Strip After Spraying of Herbicide 182 7.6 Use Suitable Protective Clothing When Spraying 183 8.1 Major Root Diseases 186 8.2 Applying Collar Protectant to Diseased Roots 188 8.3 Treating White Root Diseased-Tree by Chemical Drenching 189 8.4 Cross-Section of Isolation Trench 190 8.5 Plan of Root Disease Patch Isolation 190 8.6 Minor Root Disease 191-192 8.7 Types of Stem Disease 193-202 x 8.8 Controlling Brown Bast or Tree Dryness 204 8.9 Types of Leaf Disease 205-210 8.10 Types of Physical Injury 211-216 8.11 Types of Wind Damage and Their Treatments 217-219 8.12 Major Insects 221-236 8.13 Mollusc, Mammalian and Pest Damages 238-246 9.1 Direction of Tapping Cut 247 9.2 Slope of Tapping Cut 248 9.3 Height of Tapping and Girth Size 249 9.4 Three Dimensional Cross-Section of the Bark of the Rubber Tree 250 9.5 Cross-Section of the Bark Showing Depth of Tapping 251 9.6 Cross-Section of the Bark Showing Thickness of Tapping 252 9.7 Monthly Bark Consumption Guide Marking 253 9.8 Development of Tapping Knives In Malaysia 254 9.9 Rainguard 255 9.10 Girth Size Marking 256 9.11 Girth Measurement 257 9.12 Determining Slope of Tapping Cut 258 9.13 Marking The Tapping Cut and Opening of Tapping Panel 259-260 9.14 PVC Latex Cup Fitted With Lid and Funnel Known as RRIMCUP 261 9.15 Position of Tapping Panels and Latex Cups for Leaning Trees 262 9.16 Tapping of a Rubber Tree. A Pulling Cut is Made Right Down to 263 the Bottom Corner of Panel 9.17 Collection of Latex 264 9.18 Concentration of Ethephon Available in the Market 272 9.19 Ethephon Application Techniques 273 9.20 Ethephon-Based Stimulant, MORTEX 276 9.21 Applying MORTEX on the Groove 276 9.22 REACTORRIM Stimulation Technique 279 9.23 REACTORRIM Components 280 9.24 Fixing Procedures of REACTORRIM 281-282 9.25 Regassing of REACTORRIM Canister 283 9.26 RRIMFLOW Stimulation Technique 284 9.27 RRIMFLOW Components 285 9.28 Fixing Procedures of RRIMFLOW 285-287 9.29 RRIMFLOW Gassing Procedures in the Field 288 9.30 G-FLEX and Its Placement 290 9.31 Components of G-FLEX 290 9.32 Additional Components (G-FLEX) 291 9.33 Procedure of Fixing G-FLEX 292-293 xi 9.34 Procedure of Gassing in the Field 294 9.35 Do-It-Yourself Techniques of G-FLEX 295 9.36 The Controlled Upward Tapping (CUT) Knife 297 9.37 CUT System for the Upper Panel 298 9.38 Opening the Controlled Upward Tapping (CUT) Panel 299 9.39 Succession of Tapping Panels for Buddings (I) 306 9.40 Succession of Tapping Panels for Buddings (Ii) 307 9.41 Succession of Tapping Panels for Buddings (Iii) 308 9.42 Succession of Tapping Panels for Buddings (Iv) 309 9.43 Succession of Tapping Panels for Buddings V and Vi 310 9.44 Succession of Tapping Panels for Clonal Seedings 311 10.1 Natural Rubber Prosessing 316 10.2 Apparatus for the Determination of DRC of Latex by the Laboratory 324 Method 10.3 Apparatus for the Determination of DRC of Latex by the Dipper or 325 "Chee" Method 10.4 Apparatus for the Determination of DRC of Latex by the 325 Hydrometer Metrolac Method 10.5 Field Trial Using the Rapid Method at a Rubber Dealer Premise 328 10.6 Cuplump with Minimal Contamination 329 10.7 Cuplump Samples Before Drying 329 10.8 Cuplump Samples After Drying with Appropriate Setting 329 10.9 Uniformly Dried Cuplump Samples to Confirm Complete Drying 329 10.10 Preparation of Creped Cuplumps for Microwave Rapid Method and 330 Creped Cuplumps After Drying 10.11(a) DRC Determination Through Visual Observation 331 10.11(b) DRC Determination Through Price Cut Mechanisms 331 10.12 Usage of Guideline in Rubber Plantation 332 10.13 Sampling Areas For National Guideline on Determination of Dry 333 Rubber Content of Cuplumps Throughout Peninsular Malaysia 10.14 Examples of Good Quality Cuplumps 333 10.15 Examples of Low Quality Cuplumps 334 10.16 Bulk Processing of USS 337 10.17 Processing of USS by Pan Coagulation Method 339-340 10.18 Individual Processing of USS by Mini Coagulation Tank 341 10.19 Various Designs of Smokehouse 344 10.20 Smoking of USS 345 10.21 Grades of RSS 349 10.22 RSS Bales 351 10.23 Processing of Block Rubber 353-354 10.24 i4/fa Laval Latex Centrifuge Machine 358 10.25 Flow Diagram of the Creaming Process 359 xii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Natural rubber (NR) is a major industrial raw material harvested from the rubber tree. Among the twenty odd plant species that are known to produce rubber, no less than twelve belong to the Hevea group. Out of these, only Hevea brasiliensis from the Euphorbiaceae family is economically exploited. The tree is a native of the Amazonian rain forest of South America. Hevea is a tropical crop that can survive within 1,000 km north and south of the equator, except for the arid regions. It requires 180-250 cm of rainfall per year and a temperature of 25-35 degrees Celcius. Rubber can be planted to a maximum elevation of 500 m above sea level. It requires a deep firm soil of the loamy texture with free drainage and tolerates a water table of 100 cm from the surface and below. The rubber tree is a perennial crop with an economic life-span of approximately thirty years. When fully matured, it can reach a height of 18-20 metres. Originally identified as a forest vegetation, Hevea wood is a valuable tropical timber which comes under the semi-hard category and most suitable for the furniture industry. Its latex, harvested from the tree, has been the major contributer to the NR industry towards the development of various rubber and rubber-based products. Brief History The existence of the rubber tree and its early crude product was internationally revealed as early as the Fifteenth Century, when Columbus discovered the Americas. Since then, raw rubber was taken to Europe from time to time. About 400 years later, several discoveries were made for its uses. Some of these earliest achievements were: • 1768 - Discovery of rubber boots • 1770 - The name "rubber" given by Priestley • 1823 - Waterproof fabric by Mcintosh • 1839 - Vulcanisation process by Goodyear • 1846 - Solid tyres by Hancock • 1888 - Pneumatic tyres by Dunlop The vulcanization process founded in 1839 was considered an important breakthrough in the development of the rubber industry, setting off its widespread planting. In 1876, some 70,000 seeds (later known as the Wickham's Collection) were taken from Brazil to the Royal Botanic Garden at Kew, England. In 1877, some of these seedlings were sent to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), thirteen to the Singapore Botanic Garden and nine to Kuala 1 Kangsar. Perhaps this was how the rubber tree came to the East, and it is still believed that the rubber trees of today (in the East) originated from the Wickham's Collection. Early research and development (R&D) work on rubber was carried out from the small number of trees in the Singapore Botanic Garden. It was later intensified by H N Ridley when he became its Director in 1888. The most important development work pioneered by him was the excision tapping method of extracting latex from the tree. This is considered as another breakthrough that triggered the beginning of organised rubber planting in the East. This large-scale planting started when the first rubber estate was established in Melaka in 1903. In Peninsular Malaysia, early research in rubber was carried out by the Department of Agriculture, but as from 1925 onwards it became the entire responsibility of the Rubber Research Institute of Malaya (Malaysia) (RRIM). The RRIM became synonymous with advances in the NR industry which had been a resource centre of new technologies for the other NR producing countries as well. The R&D function is now amalgamated, together with the Tun Abdul Razak Research Centre (TARRC) in the United Kingdom, under the Malaysian Rubber Board (MRB) which was established in 1998 with the merger of the RRIM, the Malaysian Rubber Research and Development Board (MRRDB) and the Malaysian Rubber Exchange and Licensing Board (MRELB). MRB was given the task to advance and sustain the viability of rubber industry through its R&D, technical support and regulatory functions encompassing the upstream, processing and downstream sectors. World Rubber Industry World production and consumption of rubber, both natural and synthetic continued to increase in 2007. Total rubber consumption in 2007 increased to 22.90 million tonnes (Table 1.1). The growth rate in 2007 of 5.7% was the fastest pace in three years, i.e. the growth rates were 3.3% in 2006, 2 .1% in 2005 and 5.9% in 2004. NR comprised 42.12% of total rubber production in 2007. Growth in 2007 was supported by the rapid increase in demand for rubber from countries within the Asia Pacific region and non- EU Europe. World natural rubber (NR) consumption rose to 9.71 million tonnes (5.4%) as compared to synthetic rubber (SR) consumption at 13.19 million tonnes (a growth rate of 6.0%). Global SR share increased to 57.7% mainly as a result of the increase of consumption in the Asia Pacific. For NR, Asia has always been the main producer. In 2007, SR production increased to 13.32 million tonnes (4.4%). In contrast, due to weather problems, NR output was stagnant in 2007 at 9.7 million tonnes. Production in Thailand, Malaysia, India and Cambodia dropped in 2006 over 2007, but there were increases for Indonesia, Vietnam, China, Africa and Latin America. 2 TABLE 1.1 WORLD RUBBER PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION ('000 TONNES) 2000-2007 2000 2001 2002 ; 2003 2004 I 2005 1 2006 2007 Natural Rubber (NR) Production 6,762 7,328 7,332 8,033 8,748 8,882 9,680 9,685 Consumption 7,340 7,333 7,628 8,033 8,715 9,082 9,216 9,715 Synthetic Rubber (SR) Production 10,870 10,483 10,882 11,390 12,019 12,155 12,762 13,310 Consumption 10,830 10,253 10,692 11,371 11,839 11,895 12,446 13,188 All Rubber (NR + SR) Production 17,632 17,811 18,214 19,423 20,767 21,037 22,442 22,995 Consumption 18,170 17,586 18,320 19,404 20,554 20,977 21,662 22,903 Source: International Rubber Study Group (IRSG) As for NR latex, there were declines in output in Thailand, Malaysia and India but increases were noted in China and Sri Lanka. But the net result indicated a shortage of supply against the increasing trend in demand. Hence, the sustained level of high prices of NR latex in 2007. Malaysian NR Industry The rubber industry has been a pillar of the Malaysian economy since 1950's and continues to be a major contributor until the present day. Though the planted area under rubber has been continuously declining since 1982, NR production remained at about 1 million tonnes since 2004; indicative of increased land productivity. The importance of NR in terms of socio-economy cannot be denied as it sustains the livelihood of more than 200,000 smallholder families while the downstream manufacturing sector provides employment to over 64,000 workers. This sector made a significant contribution to the economy with total export earnings from three sub-sectors grew from RM5.3 billion in 1990 to RM25.3 billion in 2007. Of this, export value share of rubber products stood at RM 10.09 billion followed by rubberwood products at RM7.96 billion and natural raw rubber RM 7.21 billion. Thanks to the Government's favourable industrial policies, the rubber industry has over the years diversified from planting (upstream) into downstream manufacturing. Today, Malaysia is world's No. 1 exporter of NR gloves, catheters and latex thread. 3 Planted Area NR planted area in 2007 was estimated at 1.25 million hectares, 183,000 hectares or 12.8% lower than the 2000's figure. During the period, both the smallholdings and estates sectors experienced decreases of 8.6% and 56.9% respectively (Table 1.3). The declines reflected the conversion of rubber area to the more profitable alternative investment opportunities both within and outside the sector. According to the Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (RISDA), the rate of replanting of rubber to other crops in the smallholdings in 2000 was 38,026 hectares. Of this figure, 98% was converted to oil palm. The rate of decline in planted hectarage has however decreased with the return of high prices, sustained at encouraging levels over several years since 2003. The other major NR producers, however, expand their rubber areas from 2000-2007 (Table 1.2). This upward trend was led by Thailand with an increase of 492,000 hectares, followed by Vietnam (138,000 hectares), India (72,000 hectares) and Indonesia (42,000 hectares). Currently the smallholder sector accounts for 95.7% of the Malaysia's planted area while the balance is under the estates (Table 1.3). TABLE 1.2 AREA UNDER RUBBER IN MALAYSIA, THAILAND, INDONESIA, INDIA DAN VIETNAM ('000 HA) Year Malaysia Thailand Indonesia India Vietnam 2000 1,431 1,882 3,372 563 412 2001 1,389 1,956 3,345 567 416 2002 1,349 1,994 3,318 570 429 2003 1,315 2,019 3,290 576 441 2004 1,268 2,072 3,262 584 454 2005 1,259 2,175 3,279 598 483 2006 1,251 2,294 3,346 615 522 2007 1,248 2,434 3,414 635 550 Source: ANRPC; Monthly Bulletin Department of Statistics, Malaysia NR Production Malaysia is the third largest NR producer, producing 1.2 million tonnes in 2007 after Thailand (3.1 million tonnes) and Indonesia (2.8 million tonnes) (Table 1.4). Despite the shrinkage in planted area, production increased about 270,000 tonnes or 29.3% over 2000. 4 TABLE 1.3 PLANTED HECTARAGE OF NATURAL RUBBER ON ESTATES AND SMALLHOLDINGS IN MALAYSIA ('000 HA) Year Peninsular Malaysia P.Malaysia Total. Sabah Sarawak Sabah & Sarawak Total Malaysia Total Grand Total Estate Smallholding Estate Smallholding Estate Smallholding Estate Smallholding 1998 175.60 1,107.51 1,283.11 4.10 85.90 0.22 170.29 260.51 179.92 1,363.70 1,543.62 1999 147.72 1,064.64 1,212.36 3.21 85.01 0.22 163.95 252.39 151.15 1,313.60 1,464.75 2000 121.16 1,063.79 1,184.95 2.40 85.01 0.22 158.10 245.73 123.80 1,306.90 1,430.68 2001 93.64 1,058.78 1,152.42 1.88 85.16 Nil 149.86 236.90 95.52 1,293.80 1,389.32 2002 84.28 1,054.86 1,139.14 0.53 62.89 Nil 146.25 209.67 84.81 1,264.00 1,348.81 2003 77.93 1,027.06 1,104.99 0.53 63.89 Nil 145.55 209.97 78.46 1,236.50 1,314.96 2004 64.22 993.11 1,057.33 0.20 64.57 Nil 145.90 210.67 64.20 1,203.58 1,268.00 2005 57.17 991.81 1,048.98 0.20 65.28 Nil 156.84 222.32 57.37 1,213.93 1,271.30 2006 54.04 988.55 1,042.59 0.11 65.28 Nil 155.61 221.00 54.15 1,209.44 1,263.59 2007 53.25 966.53 1,019.78 0.10 71.00 Nil 157.16 228.26 53.35 1,194.69 1,248.04 Sources: Statistics for planted areas in Sabah - figures provided by Lembaga Industri Getah Sabah (LIGS) Statistics for planted areas in Sarawak - figures provided by Department of Agriculture Sarawak The data for total rubber planted area in Malaysia estimated by Malaysian Rubber Board TABLE 1.4 NR PRODUCTION OF MAJOR NR PRODUCING COUNTRIES ('000 TONNES) Year Thailand Indonesia Malaysia India Vietnam 1998 2,076 1,714 886 591 218 1999 2,155 1,599 769 620 262 2000 2,346 1,501 928 629 291 2001 2,320 1,607 882 632 313 2002 2,615 1,630 890 641 331 2003 2,876 1,792 986 707 364 2004 2,984 2,066 1,169 743 419 2005 2,937 2,271 1,126 772 482 2006 3,137 2,637 1,284 853 555 2007 3,056 2,755 1,200 807 602 Source: International Rubber Study Group (IRSG) Department of Statistics Malaysia TABLE 1.5 MALAYSIA'S NATURAL RUBBER PRODUCTION AND YIELD Year Estate Smallholding Total Production ('000 tonnes) Average Yield (kg/ha/yr) Production ('000 tonnes) Yield (kg/ha/yr) Production ('000 tonnes) Yield (kg/ha/yr) 1998 198.87 1,330 686.83 906 885.70 970 1999 183.06 1,447 585.81 876 768.87 960 2000 128.13 1,289 799.47 1,184 927.60 1,226 2001 99.53 1,358 782.53 1,167 882.06 1,211 2002 84.88 1,361 804.95 1,211 889.83 1,237 2003 76.36 1,344 909.29 1,270 985.65 1,280 2004 71.23 1,372 1,097.50 1,296 1,168.74 1,300 2005 65.29 1,526 1,060.73 1,320 1,126.02 1,330 2006 68.40 1,584 1,215.24 1,358 1,283.63 1,370 2007 66.83 1,620 1,132.73 1,414 1,199.55 1,424 Source: Department of Statistics Malaysia 6 Table 1.5 shows NR production from 1998-2007 in the estates and smallholdings sectors in Malaysia. Total production in 2007 was 1.20 million tonnes, 94% of which was contributed by the latter. Average land productivity of the estates sector was 1620 kg/ha/yr while that of smallholdings was 1414 kg/ha/year. For the estates sector, output has persistently been on the declining trend despite the increase in yield; reflecting the considerable decrease in planted area. NR production in the smallholdings sector increased steadily after 2001 except for a marginal decline in 2007. Among the factors for Malaysia's decline in rubber production are as follows: Wet weather conditions throughout the year Decreasing area under rubber Slow adoption of modern technologies, especially among the smallholders Some areas having overaged trees and abandoned Some replanted areas with high yielding clones are not yet in production Domestic Consumption Total domestic consumption of rubber (NR and SR) in 2007 was 579,248 tonnes (Table 1.6). This constitutes only about 2.5 % of the world total elastomer consumption. However, the above does not include the consumption of reclaimed and compounded rubber at 40,180 tonnes. Total NR:SR consumption ratio was 78:22. Trends indicated an annual increase in the consumption of SR since the 1990's. Malaysia is the largest consumer of natural rubber latex and the fifth-largest consumer of NR in the world. Importation of NR continued unabated to supplement seasonal shortfalls in local raw material to sustain the latex- and rubber-based manufacturing industries. Sources of import are mainly from South East Asian producers. However, with the declining production trend coupled with substantial increase in local usage and price advantages, the pressure was on for greater raw material importation, especially for latex concentrate. In 2007, a total of 605,120 tonnes rubber were imported. Of all the suppliers, Thailand became the most dominant source of imports, from only 13,990 tonnes in 1991 to 421,480 tonnes (69.7%) in 2007. Industry's Export Contribution The Malaysian rubber industry is a RM25 billion industry in 2007. Export value contribution of rubber products stood at RM 10.09 billion followed by raw rubber at RM7.21 billion. Rubber wood products contributed another RM7.96 billion mainly from the export of rubber wood-based industry (Table 1.7). Since 2001, rubber products and 7 TABLE 1.6 MALAYSIA'S RUBBER CONSUMPTION BY TYPE (TONNES) Year Natural Rubber Synthetic Rubber Total NR and SR Total rubber Tonnes %of World's Tonnes %of World's Tonnes NR.SR %of World's Ratio 1990 172,997 3.33 14,595 0.15 187,592 92.2:7.8 1.3 187,592 1995 307,750 5.13 44,145 0.48 351,895 87.5:12.5 2.3 351,895 1996 360,784 5.90 46,668 0.49 407,452 88.6:11.4 2.6 407,452 1997 360,188 5.57 48,857 0.49 409,045 88.1:11.9 2.5 409,045 1998 333,310 5.07 43,309 0.44 376,619 88.5:11.5 2.3 376,619 1999 344,447 5.18 57,587 0.56 402,034 85.7:14.3 2.4 402,034 2000 363,715 4.99 55,608 0.51 419,323 86.7:13.3 2.3 419,323 2001 400,888 5.46 57,699 0.56 458,587 87.5:12.5 2.6 458,587 2002 407,884 5.35 63,150 0.59 471,034 86.6:13.4 2.6 471,034 2003 421,781 5.47 66,452 0.58 488,233 86.4:13.6 2.5 488,233 2004 402,769 4.88 84,236 0.73 487,005 82.7:17.3 2.5 498,321 2005 386,472 4.42 96,417 0.81 482,889 80.0:20.0 2.4 494,582 2006 383,324 4.32 112,385 0.91 495,709 77.1:22:9 2.3 518,834 2007 450,246 4.62 129,002 0.98 579,248 77.7:22.3 2.5 619,428 Source: Department of Statistics Malaysia International Rubber Study Group (IRSG). rubber wood sub-sectors indicated continued increase in export contribution. NR sub- sector also registered an increase during the period except for a remarkable decrease in 2007 of RM1.0 billion or 12.5 % over 2006. Rubber Products Industry Only China, USA, Japan and India consume more rubber than Malaysia. The rubber products sub-sector contributes the highest in terms of export value. The composition of export contribution from this sub-sector is still skewed in favour of latex-based products at 75% in 2007 (Table 1.8). Tyre and inner tubes contributed about 9% followed by general rubber goods (8%) and other products categories at about four percent. 8 TABLE 1.7 EXPORT VALUE CONTRIBUTION OF THE MALAYSIAN NR INDUSTRY Year Natural Rubber (RM billion) Rubber Products (RM billion) Heveawood Products (RM billion) Industry Total (RM billion) % Contribution to National Export 2000 2.58 5.69 5.10 13.37 3.58 2001 1.88 5.71 4.59 12.18 3.65 2002 2.49 5.53 4.90 12.92 3.63 2003 3.58 6.06 5.37 15.01 3.86 2004 5.21 7.88 6.47 19.56 4.07 2005 5.79 8.03 7.25 21.07 3.95 2006 8.24 8.95 7.68 24.87 4.22 2007 7.21 10.09 7.96 25.27 4.18 Source: Department of Statistics Malaysia Malaysian Timber Industry Board (MTIB) Imports Malaysia imports of raw rubber in 2007 increased to over 600,000 tonnes as compared to 512,000 tonnes in 2006. Of the total, latex is about 57 percent. Thailand is Malaysia's major source of imported rubber followed by Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines. Since 2004, the industry imports approximately RM2 billion worth of rubber products mainly general rubber goods (GRGs) and tyres (Table 1.9). Other imports included industrial rubber goods (IRGs), latex goods, footwear and inner tubes. The general trend has been that of annual increase in the imports of rubber products. The large majority of companies involved in the production of industrial and general rubber goods are the small- and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) comprising mainly of contract manufacturers to local and foreign companies. Strategic partnership and business alliances amongst some of the SMEs have led to improvements in production processes and technologies to enable them to move into the export market. In the highly labour intensive footwear industry, most locally-owned companies have relocated their operations in other countries particularly in the South East Asian region to capitalise on the relatively lower labour cost. g TABLE 1.8 EXPORT OF RUBBER PRODUCTS BY PRODUCT SECTOR (VALUE IN RM MILLION) Year Tyre Inner Tubes Footwear Latex Products Industrial Rubber Goods General Rubber Goods Industry Total Value %of National Exports 1990 210.59 22.89 111.49 1,346.48 21.72 163.50 1,876.67 2.4 1995 164.01 14.68 203.69 3,103.13 52.02 329.44 3,866.98 2.1 1996 191.84 16.14 188.13 3,393.67 61.31 336.92 4,188.02 2.1 1997 164.43 10.54 198.79 3,697.26 113.75 426.80 4,611.58 2.1 1998 321.63 15.80 211.79 5.260.10 198.37 483.43 6,491.12 2.3 1999 292.64 15.31 275.05 4,737.98 196.95 508.59 6,026.53 2.4 2000 243.89 13.56 301.97 4,498.84 130.04 497.23 5,685.55 1.5 2001 504.82 32.02 282.65 4,277.38 137.12 477.25 5,711.26 1.7 2002 418.20 34.00 209.84 4,335.46 62.01 465.67 5,525.17 1.6 2003 301.73 15.15 262.05 4,809.04 150.99 525.60 6,064.56 1.6 2004 413.65 18.10 857.42 5,818.37 188.88 580.19 7,876.61 1.6 2005 457.72 26.47 459.66 6,159.67 253.01 674.47 8,031.00 1.5 2006 552.15 22.76 370.20 6,956.18 320.98 729.55 8,951.83 1.5 2007 912.61 26.18 385.02 7,591.90 407.93 769.54 10,093.17 1.7 Source: Department of Statistics Malaysia NR Prices One significant difference in the rubber industry scenario currently is the protracted high NR price level over the last four to five years. The encouraging price is expected to sustain and this single factor impacts significantly on the livelihood of thousands of smallholder families. Hevea as a timber species becomes relatively the more attractive species to be planted as a plantation crop for timber production. A slow down in the conversion of rubber land to oil palm is expected and a there may be a return to rubber plantation by the private sector in locations where conditions are favourable to rubber planting, especially to the demarcated rubber zones. 10 TABLE 1.9 IMPORTS OF RUBBER PRODUCTS BY PRODUCT SECTOR (RM MILLION) Year Tyres Inner Tubes Footwear Latex Products Industrial Rubber Goods General Rubber Goods Total %of National Imports 1990 31.42 1.40 18.34 36.55 53.93 122.78 264.41 0.3 1995 113.15 8.25 83.37 92.76 76.57 259.38 633.48 0.3 1996 92.02 8.39 102.78 99.74 83.07 286.65 672.65 0.3 1997 122.52 8.08 131.69 76.03 196.05 395.65 930.03 0.4 1998 64.96 5.55 70.03 127.79 185.93 368.77 823.03 0.4 1999 115.28 8.25 104.50 143.25 201.27 410.08 982.63 0.4 2000 190.46 9.46 160.64 171.53 199.15 460.84 1,192.09 0.4 2001 384.03 16.68 169.68 262.07 206.38 430.65 1,469.50 0.5 2002 478.13 10.90 207.44 162.81 168.28 442.58 1,470.15 0.5 2003 296.22 6.92 304.50 217.13 240.14 417.00 1,481.90 0.5 2004 436.56 7.77 543.43 252.60 315.58 525.23 2,083.16 0.5 2005 503.75 12.17 229.69 306.11 353.78 589.17 1,994.68 0.5 2006 623.82 21.99 317.00 330.79 418.31 646.02 2,357.94 0.5 2007 769.34 31.01 358.77 340.49 376.44 587.26 2,463.37 0.5 . Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia Since 2003, the scenario for the NR upstream plantation sector has been one of encouraging prices for growers. This is a departure from the traditionally depressed and protracted low prices of the 1980's and 1990's. Changes in world trade and economy, especially with the China factor and an unprecedented increase in oil prices, had impacted favourably on NR prices. The tripartite cooperation amongst the three leading world producers of rubber, Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia, has also, to some extent, resulted in positive sentiments to sustain prices at reasonably high levels. Prices have increased steadily since the end of 2001 from a low SMR 20 fob price of 183.5 sen/kg in December 2001 to a record high of 894.5 sen/kg in month of July 2006. Since 2005, prices still fluctuated but hovered over a higher band of between 443 sen/kg to 894.5 sen/kg and has breached the 1,000 sen/kg since June 2008. This higher band of prices has been sustained up to 2008 under present world economic scenario. 11 The latest development, in tandem with the rising price of crude oil, increasing production cost of SR and an increasing world demand for NR from the Asia Pacific regions has caused the price of rubber to surpass the RM 10.007kg mark for SMR 20 in June 2008. The rubber producers are hoping the world's prices for NR will be sustained over a long period to spur a renewed interest in the rubber industry. Industry Outlook Upstream Sector The rubber industry has gone through a significant structural change involving the smallholdings sector, which is less efficient in terms of rubber production compared to the estates sector. The former, which forms the backbone of the industry, is being given special attention. Smallholdings currently account for 95.7% of planted area and 94.4% of production. The average land productivity of the smallholdings sector in 2007 was 1,414 kg/ha/year compared to 1,620 kg/ha/year for the estates sector. The national yield average stood at 1,424 kg/ha/year in 2007. It is estimated that there will still be about 1.2 million hectare under rubber by the year 2010, of which 95% will remain as smallholdings. This area should be able to produce around 1.0 million tonnes annually provided that replanting programme is carried out at a targeted rate of 20,000 ha annually. With reduced planted area and the need to maintain competitiveness, yield must increase via breeding, adoption of new latex harvesting technologies and sound agronomic practices. With better clones such as the Latex Timber Clones (LTCs), the national average yield should increase from 1,300 kg/ha a hectare to more than 1,700 kg/hectare. LTCs are capable of high yields in latex and timber, which provide the raw materials needed for the rubber and rubber wood product industries. Clusters of smallholdings are encouraged to adopt new latex harvesting technologies under the low-intensity tapping system (LITS) concept while stimulation techniques to improve tree productivity, involving stimulation technologies such as MORTEX for young trees and gaseous stimulation for RRIMFLOW, REACTORRIM and G-FLEX, have to be introduced to offset the possible reduction in yield resulting from adopting LITS. The industry has been plagued by a shortage of labour, primarily skilled tappers causing severe reduction in national rubber production in early 2000 but the situation has been gradually recovered due to the present buoyant rubber price and the availability of foreign labour. 12 Midstream Sector For the midstream sector, the Government is focusing on increasing the efficiency in the processing of rubber, production of specialty rubbers for niche markets and competitive environment-friendly processing techniques locally and overseas. R&D is being conducted to add value to rubber-processing factories' effluents, which can be used for biochemical extractions. This includes the introduction of environment-friendly processing technology to minimise effluent and waste discharges, and applications of bioprocess technologies to produce value-added product such as quebrachitol, which is a chemical feedstock for the synthesis of bioactive material. Downstream Sector There are three major product sub-sectors with potential for greater development which include: latex products, industrial and general rubber products and tyres. The service sub-sectors comprise testing and certification of rubber products. Malaysia has an edge over other countries in terms of its R&D facilities, manufacturing technology, product design innovations and marketing capability. MRB shall capitalise on its strengths to maintain the lead. The rubber industry is expected to remain a strategic sector of the Malaysian economy even beyond 2020 if its diversification plans into higher value-added rubber products such as general (GRG) and industrial rubber goods (IRG) are any indication. The Government's support is the main driver of the industry's growth. The ongoing governmental efforts are aimed at strengthening the country's position as the leading manufacturer and exporter of latex products, expanding export markets for rubber products, building and retaining Malaysia's image as a supplier of quality rubber products and widening the present product range by developing the industrial and general rubber product sub-sectors. In particular, MRB is intensifying its efforts to promote the Standard Malaysian Glove (SMG) programme for the premium medical gloves. The programme aims at production of quality gloves which in turn will enable the industry players to fetch remunerative prices. According to MRB, consumers can be assured that SMG-certified gloves are high in barrier performance, the lowest in protein and powder contents, superior in tactile sensitivity, high in strength besides being environment-friendly. A total of 30 glove companies were certified as SMG manufacturers in 2007. 13 Research and Development Focus R&D is a crucial component that will provide an edge for Malaysian rubber products. MRB's R&D programmes have resulted in the development of high quality, technically- specified rubbers suitable for the manufacture of specialised rubber products. Meanwhile, at its technology centres in Sungai Buloh and Brickendonbury, United Kingdom, MRB is engaged in R&D to improve efficiency and productivity in the manufacture of high value- added products. Some potential R&D areas are in automotive rubber components, and development of NR for engineering, medical, military, sports and transportation. The private and public sectors should co-operate to develop rubber product manufacturing hubs and to spur growth as an approach to diversify the industry. The 'green' rubber Ekoprena is an environment-friendly processed rubber that can be used as a component for many rubber-based products. On the other hand, biotechnology can provide a new source of growth to develop genetically improved rubber trees and manufacture of value-added products in pharmaceutical and medical sectors. Latex Harvesting Technologies In late 1980's, the LITS concept was introduced and recommended for commercial adoption by the NR industry because of low rubber production. Due to enumerative factors, large productive rubber areas were left untapped. The income from rubber tapping became very unattractive compared with other economic activities. Most rubber holdings and estate owners resorted to employing foreigners for tapping rubber trees. Latex harvesting technologies under LITS concept were introduced and recommended to the NR industry for addresing issues of shortage of tappers. These technologies offer numerous advantages which have been proven in R&D activities carried out by the MRB. MRB has also introduced latex harvesting technologies for all ages of Hevea trees designed for increasing tree, tapper and land productivity and the income of tapper. Improvements have been made to the current conventional stimulation techniques based on feedback and continued R&D activities by MRB. The ethephon-based formulation (MORTEX) allowed more frequent applications which can be adopted from opening of tapping with more consistent high yield and minimal deleterious effect on the growth. The improved gaseous stimulation technique is characterised by more user-friendly gadgets and easier to operate and maintain devices. With relatively cheaper than other gaseous stimulation available in the market, this would encourage more smallholders to use this technique. 14 Rubber Forest Plantation for Timber Production In ensuring adequate supply of raw materials for downstream activities, rubber trees have been bred for dual purposes; namely, for the production of latex and timber. In contrast to the 30-year conventional replanting and wood harvesting, the rubber plantation for timber concept spanning a 15-year life cycle has been adopted with latex production scheduled between five to seven years before rubber trees are felled for timber. Hence, there is a need to develop exploitation systems which can produce higher land productivity from opening of tapping and sustained over the scheduled exploitation period starting from the ninth year after planting. Early results from the non-LTC clones showed that there are promising exploitation systems which can produce up to 2,000 kg/ha/year. Irrespective of the purpose of rubber planting, appropriate and adequate agronomic inputs are required to ensure sustainable production. With good rubber prices and support from the government who is encouraging the establishment of rubber plantation for wood extraction through the provision of financial and fiscal incentives, the industry envisions the setting up of rubber plantation for timber on a large scale. As land is limited in Peninsular Malaysia, more rubber plantation would be established in Sabah and Sarawak. Strategies and action plans to meet anticipated surge in demand for planting materials are needed and must be periodically reviewed parallel with changes in the rate of establishment of rubber plantation for timber. At the same time, advisory and extension services must be extended to interested investors who are unfamiliar with the management of plantation crops such as rubber. Investments in rubber plantation for timber can be more attractive if the activity is fully integrated to take advantage of the attractive value-added revenue from downstream rubberwood processing and product manufacturing. Rubber plantation development is expected to be concentrated in Sabah and Sarawak in view of the huge concession areas that must be reforested with rubber as a timber species. Several saw-milling companies in East Malaysia have integrated upstream into the planting of Hevea in previously logged concession areas. The growth of rubberwood processing and rubberwood products manufacturing in Sabah and Sarawak could be a likely development strategy for the future. This reforestation programme will ensure adequate and uninterrupted wood supply while providing good margins from value-added processing. It is in the long-term interest of the rubberwood-based manufacturers to take steps to ensure that their enterprises are not jeopardised by any raw material shortages. Rubberwood products, especially furniture, have received very favourable responses from the world market and much of the potentials for both the product and its markets have yet to be fully tapped. In this light, private sector manufacturers should have the 15 foresight to invest in the future expansion of rubber plantation for timber. Malaysia still has the technical edge over other rubber producing countries as far as silviculture and agro-management of rubber trees are concerned. It has in stock some of the best bred species of rubber trees for plantation timber. Cognisance must be taken of these inherent advantages. The MRB as the custodian of the NR industry will continue to provide unrelenting support to all local parties involved in rubber forest planting activities. Rubberwood Products Growth of the rubberwood products manufacturing sub-sector continues to be encouraging amidst trends that indicate future shortage of rubber timber supply. Export revenue contribution from this sector overtook that of raw rubber since 1998 but fell behind in 2006 only on account of the unprecedented high raw rubber prices. Revenue from this sub-sector is expected to match that of rubber products in the near future. In 2007, its export value contribution at RM 7.96 billion constituted about one-third of the total export value contribution of the rubber industry {Table 1.10). Rubberwood furniture exports account for 67% of the total export value contribution. The remarkable growth of the Malaysian furniture manufacturing sector is very much supported by rubberwood which accounts for some 80% of export revenue from all species of wooden furniture. TABLE 1.10 EXPORT VALUE CONTRIBUTION OF THE RUBBERWOOD PRODUCT SUB-SECTOR Products Export Value Contribution of Rubberwood Products 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 1 .Sawntimber 0 87 92 60 137 386 70 55 2. Furniture 3,535 3,023 3,339 3,736 4,351 4,665 5,127 5,332 3. Mouldings 313 224 229 208 647 698 796 915 4. MDF 823 873 867 979 1021 1,107 1,145 1181 5. Chipboard 160 134 1.16 102 196 267 267 365 6. Builders' Carpentry & Joinery 269 243 261 281 110 116 103 102 7. Wooden Frames - - - - 12 13 12 13 Total 5,100 4,585 4,903 5,366 6,472 7,252 7,520 7,963 Source: Malaysian Timber Industry Board (MTIB) Rubber Development Agencies In Malaysia there are several rubber development agencies, each one with specific functions, such as R&D, plantation development, financing, marketing, supervision and coordination. Table 1.11 lists out the various agencies involved and their functions. 16 TABLE 1.11 MALAYSIAN RUBBER DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES Names of Agency Functions Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities Coordination and supervision Ministry of Rural and Regional Development Coordination Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Coordination and supervision Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) Coordination and supervision Ministry of Higher Education Training development Ministry of Finance Supervision Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-Based Industry Training development Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (RISDA) Planting development Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA) Planting development Federal Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Authority (FELCRA) Planting development Kelantan Selatan Development Authority (KESEDAR) Plantation development Terengganu Tengah Development Authority (KETENGAH) Plantation development Johor Tenggara Development Authority (KEJORA) Plantation development Pahang Tenggara Development Authority (DARA) Plantation development Lembaga Kemajuan Perusahaan Pertanian Pahang (LKPPP) Plantation development Lembaga Urusan Tabung Haji Plantation development Farmers Organisation Authority Plantation development Sabah Rubber Industry Board (LIGS) Planting development Sabah Land Development Board Plantation development Sabah Forest Development Authority (SAFODA) Plantation development Sarawak Land Development Board Sarawak Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Authority (SALCRA) Department of Agriculture Malaysia Plantation development Plantation development Training development Department of Agriculture Sabah Training development Department of Agriculture Sarawak (JPS) Training and planting development State Land Development Boards of Peninsular Malaysia Plantation development State Economic Development Corporations of Peninsular Malaysia Plantation development Department of Forestry of Peninsular Malaysia Plantation development Department of Forestry Sarawak Plantation development Department of Forestry Sabah Plantation development Malaysian Rubber Development Corporation (MARDEC Berhad) Processing and marketing development Malaysian Timber Industry Board (MTIB) Plantation development Kuala Lumpur Commodity Exchange Market development Malaysian Rubber Export Promotion Council (MREPC) Industrial promotion Malaysian Industrial Development Authority (MIDA) Industrial promotion With such numerous agencies dealing in rubber-related development, the continuance of this industry in Malaysia is something which is economically feasible. What is actually required is commitment from those involved. Some of the measures suggested towards achieving the vision, are: 17 • Replacement of rubber with other crops should be prohibited unless the soil is proven unsuitable • Replanting of smallholdings should, wherever possible, be carried out on group basis for more efficient management inputs • Where possible rubber should be planted with other perennial crops to avoid dependence on rubber alone • Provide some form of incentives, to attract the smallholders • Ensure a more active role of the extension services machinery of the development agencies so that modern technologies are adopted to the maximum by the rubber growers Sustaining the Malaysian Rubber Industry The world's demand for NR will be on an increasing trend especially with the emergence of rapid development among Asian countries such as China and India and the upsurge in crude oil price which may favour increased consumption of NR as compared to the the synthetic rubber. Malaysia needs to stay competitive in the global market and among the reasons why Malaysia must continue planting and producing rubber are: • Rubber is a strategic crop • Rubber planting is a source of income for the smallholders who are now the major players in terms of production and hectarage under rubber • It provides numerous job opportunities • Rubber production also contributes to national income • To supply the world's demand for natural rubber • To supply Malaysia's own need for the raw material, rubber-based products manufacturing and timber industries of Malaysia • To maintain Malaysia's position as one of the major NR producers • To contribute towards greening the world for a cleaner and healthier environment The prospect of NR industry is very promising in the near future due to its economic viability and sustainability which will continue to provide better socio-economic status to the smallholders. The good prices may encourage the younger generation smallholders to stay in rubber industry. Young graduates may involve themselves in the production process if it promises better income. This may be the beginning of a more educated and much younger smallholders wanting to move further into the production chain. Currently, the government places greater focus on agriculture as a major engine of growth. Rubber will assume greater importance as a sector for economic 18 expansion and income generation. As part of the national plans to make Malaysia a centre of excellence and a world leader in commodity-based industries, intensive efforts are on to improve the NR industry through education in plantation management, R&D and commercialisation of intellectual properties. It will be an integrated socio-economic entity that will ensure sufficient raw materials to sustain the requirements of the rubber processing, rubber products and rubber wood furniture sectors. The Malaysian rubber industry should grab this opportunity to produce more NR and gain maximum benefits from the current situation. 19 Henry Wickham (1876) The natural rubber industry owes a great debt to this specimen collector, explorer and trader H.N. Ridley (1888) He performed a one-man crusade persuading planters to attempt cultivation of rubber 20 CHAPTER 2 DEVELOPMENT OF RUBBER CLONES The rubber tree is just like any other living plant of the same category. It consists of the crown at the top which contains the branches and the leaves, the stem or trunk in the middle and the root system below ground. The crown. The leaves grow on the leaf stalks, known as the petioles and connected by the petiolules. When the petiole falls off, a scar is left on the twig, branch or stem. The rubber tree defoliates its leaves annually, during the dry spell (January to March). This is known as wintering; the nature's way of preventing the water in the tree from being transpired through the leaves. The bud found between the petiole and the branch or stem is known as the axillary bud. The leaf scar left by the falling petiole also has a bud known as the scale bud. The bud that grows into a branch is known as latent, while the one that does not is called a dormant bud. At the very tip of the rubber plant there is also a bud known as the epical bud, which is ever-growing and forms the tree height. The rubber tree is a flower-bearing tree. The flowers are of the inflorescence type, where both the males and females can be found. They are attached to the axis, the central and the sides. The female flowers are found only at the tip of the axis (central and sides) and the male flowers in the inflorescence. The male flower contains the anther and the pollen grains, while the female contains the stigma and the ovary. When the pollen grains enter the female flower through the stigma, fertilisation takes place. This is known as the pollination process. In rubber, the main agent for pollination is insects. Pollination produces fruits consisting of two to five seeds in each pod. The time taken from pollination to seedfall is approximately five months. Pollination can also be done manually and this is known as hand pollination. Hand pollinated seeds are usually required for breeding purpose. The whole outer hard cover of the rubber seed and fruit is purely made up of the female tissue. Although the formation of the fruit cannot occur without fertilisation, no male tissue enters it. The embryo which is found in the centre of the seed is the result of the union between the male and the female cells and inherits the characteristics of both. The embryo germinates and eventually grows into a tree. Seeds of a single mother tree (clone) exhibit visual characteristics that can be accurately identified. The stem. The stem (also called as the trunk) consists of the central column known as the pith or medulla which is surrounded by the bark. The bark has three main 21 layers, the outermost of which is the soft bast where latex-bearing vessels are found. Between the bark and the wood is the cambium, a soft thin layer, which by mitosis keeps a supply of new conducting pipes for the upward and downward streams, by producing new wood cells inwardly and new bast outwardly as the tree grows in size. The medullary rays are horizontally situated in the bark. Their functions are to supply water to the bark in one direction and food to the wood in the other direction. Latex, which is the economic yield of the rubber tree, is found in the latex vessels. It is a whitish milky fluid containing rubber hydrocarbon in the form of small globules floating in an aqueous solution containing proteins, amino acids, carbohydrates and various electrolytes. Latex is still considered a byproduct of the rubber tree, but a highly useful raw material to mankind. The roots. The roots are part of the plant and are found in the soil. The rubber tree has three categories of roots. The tap root is the main central root that penetrates deep down the soil and keeps the rubber tree upright. The main and sub-laterals grow on it and provide anchorage to the tree. Feeder roots, which are numerous, grow on the laterals. Their functions are to absorb water by osmosis. At the tips of the feeder roots are the root hairs which absorb nutrient solution. The water absorbed by the feeder roots is forced into the central cylinder of the wood vessels and to the leaves. These remove the mineral food, retain water that is needed by the plant, and release the excess moisture through the stomata. The rubber tree takes in oxygen from the atmosphere through the stomata and lenticels, and gives out carbon dioxide as waste product of the respiratory process. Desired Characteristics of a Rubber Tree Rubber tree with desired characteristics will ensure its long term survival and at the same time will produce good yield throughout its economic life. It is important for the planters to have the knowledge on these desired characteristics as it will assist them when choosing good planting materials. The desired characteristics are: • The tree has good vigour to ensure early maturity and production. • Good girth increase when tapped, so that the stem is able to support the extended and heavy crown. • The size of the leaves must be broad with shiny dark green colour to ensure of good food supply for the tree through photosynthesis. • The main branches are well extended and growing upward to give balance to the crown. • The side branches should be small and balanced, growing laterally and orderly to maintain balance and give lighter crown. 22 • The tree must be shady and not easily shaken by wind. • The stem must be straight, smooth, well rounded and stood upright. • The virgin bark is thick and smooth for easy tapping. • The renewed bark is smooth, thick and quick to recover so that it can be re-tapped easily. • High yielding; and during wintering the yield will be maintained without much reduction. • Respond readily to yield stimulants. • Once tapped the tree immediately exudes latex with good flow. • When possible, the rate of tapping can be enhanced. • The latex is stable and has high dry rubber content. • The trees are not susceptible to diseases, wind damage and bark dryness. • The tree must be suitable to be planted in all kind of environments. It was found that all these desired characteristics are present in the existing rubber trees. However, not all of them were found in one tree. Further efforts are continued to produce a perfect rubber tree through breeding (Figure 2.1) CROWN - conical shape with broad base BRANCH - having a prominent leader and with side ones relatively small and horizontally positioned (wide angle attachment to the stem) LEAF - dark green, large and disease resistant STEM/TRUNK - Upright, straight, well-rounded and with good growth BARK - thick, smooth, giving high yield and with good renewals Figure 2.1 Profile of a perfect tree 23 PROPAGATION OF RUBBER Propagation can be defined as efforts to produce, increase or multiply quality planting materials, so that they are always available when required. Like any other living plant, the rubber tree terminates its life, by death or destruction due to diseases, pests or natural calamity. Therefore, to ensure its replacement, propagation of that particular tree must be carried out. The rubber tree can be propagated by sexual and vegetative means. Sexual Propagation Sexual propagation produces offsprings which have variations in their characteristics. This means that their performances and capabilities are not guaranteed, although the mother tree itself may be perfect. Propagation by this method is done through pollination which can occur naturally or manually. The process involves the removal of the anther containing pollen grains from the male flower and putting it in the stigma of the female flower. Fertilisation takes place. Fruit and seeds are formed, which mature in about five months (Figure 2.2). a) Pollinating rubber flower b) Rubber fruits Figure 2.2 Hand Pollination Process 24 Vegetative Propagation This method of propagation reproduces almost exactly the type of plant from where the propagated part is taken. In rubber, there are several propagation techniques, which can be broadly grouped into three, namely, cuttings, graftings and tissue culture. Among these, grafting is mostly preferred. Again, in grafting there are several options such as approach-grafting, cleft-grafting, root/seed-grafting and budgrafting. But budgrafting is the most popular as it is the simplest and guarantees higher grafting success. Budgrafting of rubber was first introduced in Sumatra in 1917 and is known as brown or conventional budding. From this, the green budding technique was developed in 1958. Further improvement on this led to the development of young budding in 1968. In this book, only the green and young budding techniques are described. Green budding One of the components for the green budding technique is the seedling stock of five to six months old, which can either be raised in polybags, ground nursery or open field. The stock should attain a stem size of 1.25 cm in diameter at the base. The other component is the bud which is taken from leafy green shoot of desired clones. To start budding operation, the base of the stock plant is wiped clean with a piece of cloth or rag. Two vertical cuts are made at the base of the stock stem, 7.5 cm high and 1 cm apart, and they are joined by a horizontal cut either at the upper or lower end. The bark is then stripped off either upward or downward depending on where the horizontal cut was made. The bark is cut away leaving 1 cm of tongue to hold the budslip in position later on. This operation creates an exposed budding panel of 6.5 cm x 1 cm. It is important that this exposed panel is not touched or allowed to be dirtied or left too long and became dry. A budslip of 10 cm in length is cut away from the budstick, including a thin slice of the wood. The bark is peeled off to remove the wood. It should be ensured that the inner side of the bark is not touched, dirtied, bent, bruised or exposed for too long. One end of the budpatch is then carefully slipped into the tongue of the budding panel, and the other extra end of the budpatch, which is already touched by the fingers, is trimmed off to fit into the budding panel, ensuring at the same time that the budpatch is not placed upside-down. The budslip is then firmly secured by tying a piece of transparent polythene tape of 16 mm x 0.05 mm. The budpatch should still be visible after this. Three weeks later, if the budpatch is still green (with callus formation around it), the budding operation is successful. The stock stem is cut-back at 10 cm above the bottom end of the budding panel and at the same time the polythene tape is removed. The scion shoot is expected to sprout in two to three weeks (Figure 2.3). 25 d) Inserting budpatch into e) Securing the budpatch using f) Completed budding process the "tongue" polythene tape Figure 2.3 Green budding process Young budding In the young budding technique, the seedling stocks are raised in polybags of 18 cm x 38 cm layflat dimensions. They should reach buddable size in about ten weeks with basal diameter of 6 millimetres. The buds used are also green but much younger in age and smaller in size than normally used in green budding. As usual, the base of the stock plant is cleaned. Two vertical cuts are made at the base of the stock plant 6 cm high and 0.6 cm apart, and joined by a horizontal cut at either the bottom or upper end. The bark is stripped off upward or downward depending on where the horizontal cut was made, and the bark is cut away leaving 1 cm of tongue to hold the budslip later on. This would expose a budding panel of 5 cm x 0.6 cm. Again, please ensure that this panel in not contaminated or left to dry. A budslip of 8 cm long is cut away from the budstick, including a thin slice of the wood. The bark is carefully 26 a) Making vertical and horizontal cuts b) Opening the flap c) Slicing the budstick j) Scion shoot that k) Polybags kept in the nursery I) Ready for transplanting has emerged Figure 2.4 Young budding process peeled off to remove the wood. The same precaution must be taken with regards to the budpatch as described in the green budding operation. One end of the budpatch is then inserted into the tongue of the budding panel, while ensuring its position is not upside- down. The extra end of the budpatch already touched by the fingers is trimmed to fit into the budding panel. The budding can now be secured firmly by winding it around a transparent polythene tape of 16 mm x 0.05 mm in size. The budpatch should also be visible. Four weeks later, the budding can be inspected. A successful budding should have a budpatch which is still green with callus formation around it. The stock can be cut-back higher above the budding panel leaving two-leaf petioles on it to continue manufacturing food for the plant. All buds found on the stock snag must be removed by nicking to prevent them from sprouting. The stock can also be cut-back lower, leaving a much shorter snag as in the case of green budding, but this operation should be slightly delayed to a week or two to allow for the grafting to be hardened. In both cases the polythene strip binding the grafts must be removed. The scion is expected to appear in two to three weeks (Figure 2.4). 28 PLANTING RECOMMENDATIONS The MRB Planting Recommendations is updated every three years to provide information on the availability, status and performance of planting materials for the rubber planters. The MRB Planting Recommendations 2006 also follows the established format whereby the clones are recommended in two groups namely Group 1 and Group 2. However, Group 2 is further sub-divided into Group 2A and Group 2B to enable early selection among the newly recommended clones. Group 2A comprises all the clones, which showed good early performance in large-scale trials in different environments. All the newly recommended clones from the small scale trials are categorized in Group 2B as well as those clones which did not show good early performance in the various large scale clone trials. Figure 2.5 shows the different stages of testing of the different group of clones. Selection of Parents for Crossing Hand Pollination Programme 1 Hand Pollinated Seedling Trials Small Scale Clone Trials Large Scale Clone Trials Monitored Development Project Group 2B Clones Group 2A Clones t Group 1 Clones Figure 2.5 Flowchart showing the different stages testing different type of clones The clones are further subdivided into latex-timber clones and latex clones in relation to their rubber and wood production as follows: 29 (i) Latex-timber clones (LTCs) are clones with high latex yield and rubberwood production. They exhibit good growth form such as good growth vigour and possess long straight boles. These clones are suitable for the production of latex and rubberwood or production of rubberwood only. (ii) Latex clones are clones capable of producing high latex yield but relatively low rubberwood yield. These clones are suitable for latex production and not suitable for rubberwood production. Group 1 Group 1 consists of clones with known track records based on at least five years of non-stimulated yield data on BO-I and two years in BO-II and also information on the secondary characteristics in large scale trials e.g. Large Scale Clone Trials (LSCT), Monitored Development Projects (MDP) or commercial planting. These clones are recommended for planting in estates and smallholdings without any restriction imposed on number of clones and size of planting. There are 14 clones of which ten are latex- timber clones and the rest are latex clones. Latex-Timber Clones The clones are: RRIM 908, RRIM 911, RRIM 921, RRIM 928, RRIM 929, RRIM 936, PB 260, PB 350, PB 355 and PB 359. The yield data of the newly upgraded clones RRIM 928 and RRIM 929 and the PB clones viz. PB 350, PB 355, PB 359 and PB 366, are obtained from various LSCT up to the eighth year in different environments. The eight years mean yield of these clones ranged from 1200 kg/ha/year to 1690 kg/ha/year using V2S d/3 6d/7 tapping system (Table 2.1). The mean yields of the other clones over ten years tapping are 1300 kg/ha/year, 1630 kg/ha/year, 1490 kg/ha/year and 1630 kg/ ha/year for clones RRIM 908, RRIM 911, RRIM 921 and PB 260, respectively. Only clone RRIM 936 yields more than 2000 kg/ha/year, but it was tapped using 1/ 2S d/2 6d/7 tapping system. The relatively lower yields recorded for these clones as compared to their genetic potential were due to the lower number of tapping days i.e. about 70 tapping days per year. Some of the important secondary characteristics of Group 1 latex-timber clones are resistances to wind damage (varied from average to very good) and to major leaf and stem diseases (ranged from severe to no infection) (Tables 2.2 and 2.3). Most of these clones also showed below average to very good with respect to other secondary characteristics. The estimated wood production between 19-22 years after planting, ranged from 0.74 m 3/tree in RRIM 928 and RRIM 936 to 1.59 m3/tree in PB 355 (Table 30 TABLE 2.1 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 1 LATEX-TIMBER CLONES Planting material Year of tapping Mean 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RRIM 908 929 1089 1491 1506 1561 1358 1395 1431 1193 1055 1301 RRIM 911 928 1464 1859 1799 1735 1668 1769 1841 1655 1599 1632 RRIM 921 960 1209 1518 1570 1709 1527 1565 1686 1684 1448 1488 RRIM 928 1249 1593 1644 1953 1336 1631 1641 1834 - - 1610 RRIM 929 1005 1225 1445 1585 1368 1503 1396 1796 - - 1415 RRIM 936* 1280 1800 2700 2670 2080 2690 2060 2220 2350 1610 2146 PB 260 1349 1641 1496 1569 1339 1841 1996 1886 1701 1124 1594 PB 350 1643 1552 1552 1898 1688 2191 2269 2102 - - 1862 PB 355 723 1138 1146 1353 1241 1431 1403 1823 - - 1284 PB 359 661 1083 1368 1507 1416 1499 1484 1538 - - 1320 V4S d/3 6d/7 tapping system Data from Large Scale Clone Trials (LSCT) Trees per hectare: 327 + 34 * y2 S d/2 6d/7 tapping system TABLE 2.2 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 1 LATEX-TIMBER CLONES Characteristic RRIM 908 RRIM 911 RRIM 921 RRIM 928 RRIM 929 RRIM 936 PB 260 PB 350 PB 355 PB 359 Yield for first two years 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 2 2 Yield third to tenth years 3 5 4 NA NA 5 5 NA NA NA Wintering depression 4 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 Resistance to dryness 3 4 4 4 5 3 2 4 4 4 Resistance to wind damage 3 3 5 5 5 4 3 4 4 4 Vigour at opening 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 Girth increment during tapping 3 4 3 3 2 3 3 4 4 4 Virgin bark at opening 3 3 4 5 5 3 2 4 5 4 Renewed bark 3 3 3 5 5 3 2 3 4 3 5 = Very Good; 4 = Good; 3 = Average; 2 = Below Average; 1 = Poor, NA = Not available 31 2.4). The clear bole volume, measured from ground to the first persistent branch of the main trunk, ranged from 0.33 m3/tree in PB 350 to 0.63 m3/tree in RRIM 921. Generally, these clones have long, straight and smooth trunk characteristics. TABLE 2.3 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 1 LATEX-TIMBER CLONES* Characteristic RRIM 908 RRIM 911 RRIM 921 RRIM 928 RRIM 929 RRIM 936 PB 260 PB 350 PB 355 PB 359 Pink disease (incidence) N N N N N N L N N N Oidium S S S L M M M M M M Colletotrichum M L L L L VL M VL N N Corynespora N L N N N VL N N N N N = Nil VL = Very light L = Light M = Moderate S = Severe * Data from disease surveys and clone trials TABLE 2.4 ESTIMATED WOOD VOLUME OF GROUP 1 LATEX-TIMBER CLONES Planting material Age (year) Clear bole volume (mVtree) Canopy wood volume (mVtree) Estimated total wood volume (m3/tree) RRIM 908 22 0.51 0.51 1.02 RRIM 911 22 0.46 0.69 1.15 RRIM 921 22 0.63 0.63 1.26 RRIM 928 21 0.59 0.15 0.74 RRIM 929 21 0.60 0.60 1.20 RRIM 936 20 0.49 0.25 0.74 PB 260 20 0.37 0.92 1.29 PB 350* 19 0.33 0.83 1.16 PB 355* 22 0.53 1.06 1.59 PB 359* 20 0.42 1.05 1.47 *Data from Golden Hope Plantations Bhd. Clonal Trials at Prang Besar 32 TABLE 2.5 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 1 LATEX CLONES Planting material Year of tapping Mean 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RRIM 938 1350 2220 3310 2310 1910 3460 1920 1930 2360 2150 2292 PB 280 1090 1500 1890 2180 2240 2160 2310 2310 2290 2260 2023 RRIM 901 1080 1710 2230 1980 2040 2990 2220 1720 1950 1790 1971 PB 366" 1215 1376 1539 1677 1601 1789 1529 1541 - - 1533 Tapping System: 1/2S d/2 6d/7 No. of Tapping Days: 158 + 11 days Data from Large Scale Clone Trials (LSCT) Trees per Hectare: 327 + 34 ** Yield from LSCT using 1/2S d/3 6d/7 tapping system Some of the important secondary characteristics of Group 1 latex clones such as resistances to wind damage, varied from below average to very good, and to major leaf and stem diseases, ranged from severe to no infection (Tables 2.6 and 2.7). Most of these clones showed below average to very good with respect to other secondary characteristics. TABLE 2.6. SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 1 LATEX CLONES Characteristic RRIM 901 RRIM 938 PB 280 PB 366 Yield for first two years 5 5 5 5 Yield for third to tenth year 5 5 5 NA Wintering depression 1 3 4 4 Resistance to dryness 2 2 4 4 Resistance to wind damage 4 5 2 4 Vigour at opening 4 5 3 5 Girth increment during tapping 3 3 3 4 Virgin bark at opening 4 4 5 4 Renewed bark 3 4 5 3 5 = Very Good; 4 = Good; 3 = Average; 2 = Below Average; 1 = Poor 33 TABLE 2.7. DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 1 LATEX CLONES* Characteristic RRIM 901 RRIM 938 PB 280 PB 366 Pink disease (incidence) S N N N Oidium M M M M Colletotrichum M VL L VL Corynespora L N N N N = Nil VL = Very light L = Light M = Moderate S = Severe * Data from disease surveys and clone trials Group 2 Group 2 consists of 33 clones comprising 9 clones in Group 2A and 24 clones in Group 2B. Due to limited information on the performance of these clones in different environments, planting of clones from this group should comprise basket of clones and not more than 50% and 20% are from Group 2A and Group 2B, respectively. These respective clones should be planted in blocks in accordance to recommendation. Group 2A Group 2A consists of new clones, which showed good early performance of at least three years yield data in large-scale trials in different environments. This would allow rubber growers to choose new promising clones in Group 2 with low risk. Group 2A comprises seven latex-timber clones namely RRIM 2001, RRIM 2002, RRIM 2007 RRIM 2009, RRIM 2015 RRIM 2016 and RRIM 2019; and two latex clones namely RRIM 2004 and RRIM 2005. The five-year mean yields of the seven latex timber clones listed above, which were extrapolated from the Small Scale Clone Trials (SSCT) were 2850, 2350, 2710, 2280,2760,2580 and 2410 kg/ha/year, respectively. Whereas, the five year mean yields of the latex clones in the SSCT were 2467 and 2432 kg/ha/year, respectively, thus, indicating that these are potentially high yielding clones in the initial stage of testing. These clones were further tested in the LSCT in different environmental conditions throughout the country. The three-year mean yields gram/tapping/tree (g/t/t) and kg/ha/yr of the seven latex timber clones from the LSCT are given in Table 2.8. Currently, only two trials had been tapped for three years. The other trials in different part of the country were established at a later date. Generally, the yield pattern increased from the first year to the third year tapping. 34 The mean yield in g/t/t ranged from 49 (RRIM 2002) to 74.20 (RRIM 2007) whereas, the mean yield in kg/ha/yr ranged from 1610 in RRIM 2016 to 28310 in RRIM 2007. The differences in mean yield based on g/t/t and kg/ha/yr were due to the number of stand. Except for RRIM 2007, all the other clones had relatively lower mean yields as compared in the SSCT The yield of these clones is expected to increase further especially in the proceeding panels. TABLE 2.8. MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2A LATEX-TIMBER CLONES IN THE LARGE SCALE CLONE TRIALS Planting material Year of tapping Mean 1 2 3 g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr RRIM 2001 56.91 1191 50.54 1739 55.74 2045 54.40 1658 RRIM 2002 44.75 1102 51.94 1662 50.50 1732 49.06 1627 RRIM 2007 63.45 2045 77.54 3088 81.59 3360 74.19 2831 RRIM 2009 46.51 1342 49.01 1804 50.33 2005 48.62 1717 RRIM 2015 34.27 1050 50.85 1952 53.51 2191 46.21 1731 RRIM 2016 47.82 1152 57.20 1762 59.04 1921 54.69 1611 RRIM 2019 40.30 1295 49.05 2081 65.79 2905 51.71 2093 Tapping system: 1/2S d/3 6d/7 Average of two trials The important secondary characteristics of these clones are summarised in Tables 2.9, 2.10 and 2.11. Most of the clones can be tapped at five years or earlier after planting. The clones showed high girth increment at immaturity, which ranged from 9.1 cm/year to 10.0 cm/year for RRIM 2001 and RRIM 2009, respectively (Table 2.9). Generally, these clones showed good tolerance to wind damage and nil to moderate infection of various diseases in field trials and nursery screening (Tables 2.10 and 2.11). 35 TABLE 2.9 MEAN GIRTH (CM) OF GROUP 2A LATEX-TIMBER CLONES IN THE LARGE SCALE CLONE TRIALS Planting material Year after planting Mean girth increment (cm) 2nd 3rd 4th 5th RRIM 2001 15.4 24.5 34.1 42.6 9.1 RRIM 2002 17.1 27.2 37.0 45.4 9.4 RRIM 2007 18.3 29.3 38.0 45.9 9.2 RRIM 2009 15.9 29.7 37.0 46.0 10.0 RRIM 2015 18.9 30.2 40.1 46.8 9.3 RRIM 2016 17.7 28.9 38.7 47.4 9.9 RRIM 2019 17.5 29.5 39.4 45.2 9.2 Average of two trials TABLE 2.10 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 2A RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX-TIMBER CLONES Characteristic RRIM 2001 RRIM 2002 RRIM 2007 RRIM 2009 RRIM 2015 RRIM 2016 RRIM 2019 Yield for first two years 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 Resistance to wind damage 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vigour at opening 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 Virgin bark at opening 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5= very good; 4 = good; 3 = average; 2=below average; 1=poor TABLE 2.11 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 2A RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX-TIMBER CLONES IN MONITORED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Characteristic RRIM 2001 RRIM 2002 RRIM 2007 RRIM 2009 RRIM 2015 RRIM 2016 RRIM 2019 RRIM 2020 Pink disease (incidence) L N N N N L N L Oidium M M L M M M L M Colletotrichum M L M M L M M M Corynespora L N L L L L N L Phytopthora N N N N N M M S N = Nil VL = Very light L = Light M = Moderate S = Severe 36 The estimated wood volume of the Group 2A latex-timber clones at the age of 14-17 years after planting ranged from 0.60 to 1.28 m3/tree for RRIM 2007 to RRIM 2015, respectively (Table 2.12). Most of these clones showed high wood production. The bole wood volume, which is the premier wood, was also high ranging from 0.20 to 0.44 m 3/tree. TABLE 2.12 ESTIMATED WOOD VOLUME FOR GROUP 2A LATEX-TIMBER CLONES* Planting material Age (years) Clear bole volume (m3/tree) Canopy wood volume (m3/tree) Total wood volume (mVtree) RRIM 2001 17 0.41 0.82 1.23 RRIM 2002 17 0.44 0.66 1.10 RRIM 2007 14 0.20 0.40 0.60 RRIM 2009 14 0.34 0.34 0.68 RRIM 2015 14 0.43 0.87 1.30 RRIM 2016 14 0.43 0.85 1.28 * Estimated wood volume from Small Scale Clone Trials (SSCT) The two latex clones in Group 2A showed high mean yields after three years tapping with 2280 kg/ha/yr and 2030 kg/ha/yr for RRIM 2004 and RRIM 2005, respectively (Table 2.13). The important secondary characteristics of these clones are summarised in Tables 2.14, 2.15 and 2.16. These clones showed good girth increment at immaturity. Except for severe infection of Colletotrichum in RRIM 2005, these clones showed good tolerance to wind damage and nil to moderate infection of various diseases in field trials and nursery screening. TABLE 2.13 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2A LATEX CLONES IN THE LARGE SCALE CLONE TRIALS Planting material Year of tapping Mean 1 2 3 g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr RRIM 2004 49.57 1085 70.23 2343 89.35 3362 69.72 2263 RRIM 2005 65.79 999 77.69 2049 104.32 3045 82.60 2031 Tapping system: YiS d/3 6d/7 Average of two trials 37 TABLE 2.14 MEAN GIRTH (CM) OF GROUP 2A LATEX CLONES IN THE LARGE SCALE CLONE TRIALS Planting material Year after planting Mean girth increment (cm) 2nd 3rd 4th 5th RRIM 2004 15.5 26.0 35.0 41.9 8.8 RRIM 2005 16.4 25.9 35.0 41.9 8.5 Average of two trials TABLE 2.15 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 2A LATEX CLONES OF RRIM 2000 SERIES Characteristic RRIM 2004 RRIM 2005 Yield for first two years 5 5 Resistance to wind damage 4 4 Vigour at opening 4 4 Virgin bark at opening 4 4 5= very good; 4 = good; 3 = average; 2=below average; 1=poor; TABLE 2.16 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 2A LATEX CLONES OF RRIM 2000 SERIES IN SMALL SCALE CLONE TRIALS Characteristic RRIM 2004 RRIM 2005 Oidium M L Colletotrichum L S Corynespora L N N = Nil L = Light M = Moderate S = Severe Group 2B Group 2B consists of newly released clones, which are promising in the preliminary trials. These clones are selected based on five years yield data and other secondary characteristics from trials in limited scale such as SSCT. The performances of these clones in different micro-climates, soils and environments are not yet available. Area of one hectare or less should be planted with Group 1 clones or together with a basket of clones with not more than 20% of Group 2B which comprises 10 latex timber clones and 14 latex clones. 38 Latex Timber Clones The latex timber clones are RRIM 2008, RRIM 2014, RRIM 2020, RRIM 2023, RRIM 2024, RRIM 2025, RRIM 2026, RRIM 2027, RRIM 2028 and RRIM 2033. The three year mean yields of RRIM 2008, RRIM 2014 and RRIM 2020 in LSCT were generally low with 1030 kg/ha/yr, 1380 kg/ha/yr and 1650 kg/ha/yr, respectively (Table 2.17). Yield data from the other latex timber clones in Group 2B are still not available. The mean yields of these clones were therefore extrapolated from the SSCT. The five year mean yields ranged from 2007 kg/ha/year for RRIM 2014 to 3040 kg/ha/year for RRIM 2027 (7ab/e2.78). TABLE 2.17 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX- TIMBER CLONES IN THE LARGE SCALE CLONE TRIALS Planting material Year of tapping Mean 1 2 3 g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr RRIM 2008 28.98 786 32.79 1082 36.79 1236 36.52 1034 RRIM 2014 19.01 720 34.28 1526 41.84 1886 39.08 1377 RRIM 2020 36.33 1083 46.92 1796 51.30 2057 44.85 1645 Tapping system: !4S d/3 6d/7 Average of two trials TABLE 2.18 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX- TIMBER CLONES IN THE SMALL SCALE CLONE TRIALS* Planting material Year of tapping Mean 1 2 3 4 5 RRIM 2023 1989 2976 3480 2825 2848 2822 RRIM 2024 1509 2802 2828 3482 3158 2685 RRIM 2025 1921 2915 3174 2793 2967 2700 RRIM 2026 1450 2075 2172 3118 2410 2204 RRIM 2027 2381 2447 3349 3526 3477 3036 RRIM 2028 1695 1851 2836 2577 3201 2432 RRIM 2033 1442 1486 2402 2930 2306 2114 * Extrapolated yield from Small Scale Clone Trials (SSCT) 39 All the clones showed good secondary characteristics and the various disease severity on the clones ranged from moderate to no infection (Tables 2.19 and 2.20). Only RRIM 2026 showed severe infection of Colletotrichum. The girth increment before tapping and during tapping of these clones ranged from 8.5-10.7 cm/year and 2.5-7.6 cm/year respectively. The timber production for these clones ranged from 0.60 to 1.87 m3/tree at the age of 14 to 16 years old in the SSCT. Whereas, the bole volume of these clones ranged from 0.20 to 0.66 m3/tree (Table 2.21) TABLE 2.19 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX-TIMBER CLONES Characteristic RRIM 2008 RRIM 2014 RRIM 2020 RRIM 2023 RRIM 2024 RRIM 2025 RRIM 2026 RRIM 2027 RRIM 2028 RRIM 2033 Yield for first two years 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Resistance to wind damage 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vigour at opening 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Virgin bark at opening 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5= very good; 4 = good; 3 = average; 2=below average; 1=poor TABLE 2.20 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX-TIMBER CLONES IN MONITORED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Characteristic RRIM 2008 RRIM 2014 RRIM 2020 RRIM 2023 RRIM 2024 RRIM 2025 RRIM 2026 RRIM 2027 Pink disease (incidence) L N L N N N N N Oidium M M M L L L M VL Colletotrichum M L M M M M S VL Corynespora L N L N N N N N Phytopthora N N S N N N N N N = Nil VL = Very light L = Light M = Moderate S = Severe 40 TABLE 2.21 ESTIMATED WOOD VOLUME FOR GROUP 2B LATEX-TIMBER CLONES* Planting material Age (years) Clear bole volume (m3/tree) Canopy wood volume (m3/tree) Total wood volume (m'/tree) RRIM 2008 14 0.33 0.99 1.32 RRIM 2014 14 0.53 0.80 1.33 RRIM 2020 14 0.36 0.64 1.00 RRIM 2023 14 0.35 0.46 0.81 RRIM 2024 14 0.52 0.74 1.26 RRIM 2025 14 0.63 1.20 1.87 RRIM 2026 14 0.66 0.45 1.11 RRIM 2027 16 0.60 0.70 1.30 RRIM 2028 16 0.42 0.21 0.63 RRIM 2033 15 0.49 0.37 0.86 * Estimated wood volume from Small Scale Clone Trials (SSCT) Latex Clones The clones are RRIM 2003, RRIM 2006, RRIM 2010, RRIM 2011, RRIM 2012, RRIM 2013, RRIM 2017, RRIM 2018, RRIM 2021 and RRIM 2022, RRIM 2029, RRIM 2030, RRIM 2031, RRIM 2032. The five-year mean yields of the RRIM 2000 series latex clones extrapolated from the mean yields in g/t/t from the SSCT ranged from 1901 kg/ha/year for RRIM 2021 to 2548 kg/ha/year for RRIM 2003 (Table 2.22). These clones are being tested in LSCT in different environments. However, the three year mean yields of RRIM 2003, RRIM 2006, RRIM 2010, RRIM 2011, RRIM 2012, RRIM 2013, RRIM 2017, RRIM 2018, RRIM 2021 are relatively low ranging from 1040 to 1610 kg/ha/yr (Table 2.23). All the clones showed good secondary characteristics and the various disease severity on the clones ranged from moderate to no infection (Tables 2.24 and 2.25). 41 TABLE 2.22 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX CLONES IN THE SMALL SCALE CLONE TRIALS* Planting material Year of tapping Mean 1 2 3 4 5 RRIM 2029 1772 2387 2911 2841 2767 2535 RRIM 2030 1619 1732 2800 2553 2673 2275 RRIM 2031 1901 2345 2568 2698 2617 2425 RRIM 2032 1996 1835 2598 2235 2428 2218 * Extrapolated yield from Small Scale Clone Trials (SSCT) TABLE 2.23 MEAN YIELD (KG/HA/YEAR) OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX CLONES IN THE LARGE SCALE CLONE TRIALS Planting material Year of tapping Mean 1 2 3 g/t/t kg/ha/ yr g/t/t kg/ha/ yr g/t/t kg/ha/yr g/t/t kg/ha/ y RRIM 2003 44.23 1035 57.24 1662 50.50 1732 53.99 1476 RRIM 2010 40.04 624 49.20 1227 44.02 1303 44.42 1051 RRIM 2011 42.91 1402 39.51 1598 39.35 1634 40.59 1544 RRIM 2012 45.61 1184 47.06 1607 57.04 2048 50.02 1613 RRIM 2013 28.38 606 36.55 1226 37.85 1379 34.26 1070 RRIM 2017 33.48 753 36.21 1170 33.01 1189 34.23 1037 RRIM 2018 47.13 902 51.06 1453 51.76 1657 49.98 1337 RRIM 2021 40.06 1286 43.99 1621 40.39 1574 41.48 1493 Tapping system: V2S d/3 6d/7 Average of two trials TABLE 2.24 SOME IMPORTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF RECOMMENDED GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX CLONES Characteristic RRIM 2003 RRIM 2010 RRIM 2011 RRIM 2012 RRIM 2013 RRIM 2017 RRIM 2018 RRIM 2021 Yield for first two years 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Resistance to wind damage 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vigour at opening 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 Virgin bark at opening 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5= very good 4 = good 3 = average 2=below average 1=poor NA=not available 42 TABLE 2.25 DISEASE SEVERITY OF GROUP 2B RRIM 2000 SERIES LATEX CLONES IN SMALL SCALE CLONE TRIALS Characteristic RRIM 2003 RRIM 2007 RRIM 2010 RRIM 2011 RRIM 2012 RRIM 2013 RRIM 2017 RRIM 2018 RRIM 2021 Oidium M L L M M L L M L Colletotrichum M M L L M L L M M Corynespora N L N L L L L N N N = Nil VL = Very light L = Light M = Moderate S = Severe NA = Not available SEEDLINGS The planting materials from seedlings should only be obtained from recommended seed gardens such as PBIG/GG 6, 7 and 8. Only healthy seedlings with good growth form should be selected for field establishment. The commercial yield of these planting materials is given in Table 2.26. TABLE 2.26. COMMERCIAL YIELD IN KG/HA/YEAR OF RECOMMENDED SEEDLINGS Planting material Year of tapping Mean 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GG6 620 1010 1330 1490 1520 1510 1620 1640 1580 1690 1401 GG 7&8 1100 1380 1950 1840 1850 1800 - - - - 1653 Data from Golden Hope Plantations Bhd. Tapping system: 3/5S 2d/7 CLONAL SEEDS Clonal seeds are rubber seeds collected from trees of a particular clone. The clones must be of good progeny and able to produce abundant seeds. They must preferably be high yielding and with good characteristics, such as PB 5/51 and RRIM 623. Clonal Seed Collection Area The development of a good crown is important; to encourage flowering and fruiting. This can be achieved by a low planting density. The planting design should preferably be of rectangular or avenue system, with a planting design should preferably be rectangular or avenue system, with a planting distance of 9 m x 3 m. This gives a density of 360 43 points per hectare. The trees are later gradually thinned out to a final stand of 250 per hectare. The size of a seed garden depends on the quantity of seeds available at each season. It is estimated that between 35,000 and 100,000 seeds can be obtained from a hectare annually. Seed gardens must be isolated to prevent pollen from unknown materials crossing with those in the garden. This can be achieved by having a seed garden situated far away from other rubber areas. Sometimes this is not possible. A seed garden can also be set up within a rubber plantation, provided an isolation belt of 100 m around it is clearly marked out. Clones planted in the isolation belt must be the same as those in the seed garden, but the seeds found in the isolation belt are not collected for use as clonal seeds. The shape of the seed garden should preferably be square, as it gives a bigger isolated inner area than a rectangular-shaped seed garden (Figure 2.6). 160 ha > 100 m I 100 m 90 ha 100 m / \ 100 m \ I 500 m 164 ha ^100 m s 100 m 86 ha 100 m o ^100 m 610 m Figure 2.6 Schematic shape of seed gardens - square and rectangular (not to scale) 44 Arrangement of Clones for the Seed Garden A clonal seed garden may contain only clone (monoclone) or several clones (polyclone). To encourage cross pollination in a polyclone area, various clones are planted close to one another, and arranged in such a manner that an even cross pollination can take place. Usually, three to five clones are used (Figures 2.7(i-vi)). A A A B B B C C C B B B C C C A A A C C C A A A B B B Repeat Repeat Repeat Repeat Repeat i) Three clones A,B,C (each letter = 1 tree) A B C D Repeat C D A B Repeat B C D A Repeat D A B C Repeat Repeat Repeat ii) Four clones A,B,C,D ((each letter = 3 or 4 trees) A B C D E Repeat C D E A B Repeat E A B C D Repeat B C D E A Repeat D E A B C Repeat Repeat Repeat iii) Five clones A,B,C,D,E (each letter = 3 or 4 trees) 45 A A A A A A A A A A A etc B B B B B B B B B B B etc C C C C C C C C C C C etc Repeat iv) Three clones A,B,C ((each letter = 1 tree) A A A A A A A A A A A A etc. B B B B B B B B B B B B etc. C C C C C C C C C C C C etc. D D D D D D D D D D D D etc. A A A A A A A A A A A A etc. C C C C C C C C C C C C etc. D D D D D D D D D D D D etc. B B B B B B B B B B B B etc. A A A A A A A A A A A A etc. C C C C C C C C C C C C etc. B B B B B B B B B B B B etc. D D D D D D D D D D D D etc. Repeat v) Four clones A,B,C,D (each letter = 1 tree) 46 A A A A A A A A A AA etc. B B B B B B B B B B B etc. C C C C C C C C C C C etc. D D D D D D D D D D D etc. E E E E E E E E E E E etc. B B B B B B B B B B B etc D D D D D D D D D D D etc. A A A A A A A A A A A etc. C C C C C C C C C C Cetc . E E E E E E E E E E E etc. Repeat vi) Five clones A,B,C,D,E (each letter = 1 tree) Figure 2.7 Arrangement of clones in seed garden If designs as shown in Figures 2.7(i-iii) are used, close supervision must be carried out during transplanting, as the clone changes at every point, third point or fourth point. In the designs shown in Figures 2.7(iv-vi), only one clone is transplanted for the planting row. Perhaps this may reduce inter-tree competition for growth since the same type of clone is used along each row and less supervision required during transplanting. But this method is less effective in terms of cross pollination. If close supervision can be guaranteed during transplanting, designs shown in Figures 2.7(i-iii) are preferred. Types of Clonal Seed For large-scale planting (Class I), PBIG/GG6 seeds are recommended, and for moderate-scale planting (Class II), PBIG/GG7, seeds from approved areas, and seeds collected from boundaries between clones are recommended for large and moderate scale planting. Currently, clonal seeds are obtainable only from commercial sources, such as Sime Darby Berhad. 47 Besides clonal materials derived from buddings, as described earlier, clonal seeds offer another option of planting material for the plantation industry. However, in Malaysia, this type of planting material is limited to the estates sector only. Smallholders are prohibited from using them. RUBBER SEED AND ITS GERMINATION Rubber seed is also a planting material that can develop into a tree. It derives from sexual propagation, that is, through the process of pollination. Seeds are said to be the basis of all rubber trees. Whatever the material that is finally transplanted into the field, it must have started from the seed. Seeds are also raised as stock plants for all grafting processes, such as bud-grafting, cleft-grafting, approach-grafting and root/ seed-grafting. The Seed Rubber seed is of the dicotyledon type. The seed coat is semi-hard and has five sides, namely the ventral, dorsal, micropyler, frontal and sides (Figure 2.8). A hole known as the micropyle can be found at one end of the seed coat, where the micropyler is. It is through the micropyle, the radical and plumule appear, when the seed germinates. Rubber seed can be considered a vegetable product, because it is edible. It contains oil, which can be extracted for commercial use, and the byproduct can be used for poultry feed mixture. Figure 2.8 Various sizes of rubber seeds from different clones 48 Rubber seed comes from the fruit, which is the result of pollination between the male and the female flowers. Rubber trees flower normally in March and August. Seedfall occurs approximately five months later. To ensure germination, fresh-fallen seeds are used, which can easily be recognised from the appearance - shiny, heavy and defect-free. The weight of a fresh-fallen seed differs according to its size, which again differs according to the clone (clonal characteristic). As a guide, a kilogramme of RRIM 623, PB 5/51 and GT 1 seeds consists of 200, 300 and 340 seeds respectively. Rubber seed comes under the group of seeds with high water content and is therefore easily destroyed at very low or very high temperature. It has a short viability period and declines very dramatically, when exposed to direct sunlight (Table 2.27). TABLE 2.27 PERCENTAGE GERMINATION OF RUBBER SEEDS EXPOSED TO SUNLIGHT Length of exposure to sunlight (day) Percentage germination 1 95 2 68 3 9 4 1 5 0 Source: Prang Besar Research Station (PBRS) Therefore, seeds must be collected daily or alternate daily and setfor germination immediately. If this is not possible, the seeds must be spread under shade in one layer on the ground, or because of their seasonal nature, they can be packed in 10% damp sawdust or 20% damp powdered charcoal, in small perforated polybags and kept in a cold room at 7-10 °C. In this way, the seeds can be kept for three months. Stock plants are known to influence the performance of the scion, in terms of growth and later, in yield. Therefore, it is advisable to use seeds from (arranged according to their preference) PB 5/51, RRIM 623, GT 1, RRIM 712, RRIM 605, PB 217 and PB 235 clones for such purpose (Tables 2.28 and 2.29). TABLE 2.28 EFFECT OF SIX ROOTSTOCKS ON GROWTH OF SCION Type of rootstock Girth at opening (cm) Tappability (%) RRIM 600 49.2 46.2 RRIM 501 49.1 43.4 RRIM 623 51.3 57.3 Tjirl 50.8 56.6 PB 5/51 53.2 67.8 Unselected seedlings 51.7 63.4 49 TABLE 2.29 TEN YEARS SCION YIELD Combination Yield (kg/ha/year) Mean rootstock effect RRIM 600 48E/ 130 PB 5/51 RRIM 628 SG170 RRIC 52 Rootstock PB 5/51 2,512 2,469 1,839 1,747 1,716 983 1878 RRIM 623 2,119 2,094 1,870 1,637 1,604 807 1,688 Unselected Seedlings 2,155 2,101 1,640 1,503 1,503 785 1,617 Tjirl 2,317 2,004 1,566 1,630 1,292 859 1,611 RRIM 501 1,953 2,024 1,480 1,528 1,582 814 1,563 RRIM 600 2,097 1,600 1,387 1,414 1,366 892 1,459 Mean scion effect 2,192 2,049 1,630 1,577 1,513 857 1,636 Seed Germination Seeds that are to be planted out should first go through the germination process. For large quantity of seeds, it is economical to use the germination bed. This can be done by constructing a raised bed of loose soil, river sand or well-weathered sawdust 15 cm high, 100 cm wide and the length depending on the number of seeds to be set; each square metre of germination bed surface can accommodate approximately 1,000 seeds. A raised partial shade of 1 m high should be erected over the bed to prevent direct sunlight. The seeds are spread over the bed in one layer, close together. They are then pressed into the germination bed surface. The seeds are covered by putting a layer of loose soil, river sand or well-weathered sawdust to the thickness of about 1.5 cm. The seeds are watered twice daily. Germination occurs on the tenth day, but peak germination is between two and three weeks. The best time to transplant germinated seeds is when the radicals appear and the plumules are just visible above the bed surface. If transplanting is delayed, the radicals and plumules grow too long and much damage can occur. This should be avoided by timing the nursery operation well. The germinated seeds are carefully levered out of the bed with the help of a small piece of flat-end wood or bamboo. As the cotyledons provide early food to the sprouting plumules/radicals, care should be taken not to detach the seeds from them. The germinated seeds must be transplanted immediately (Figure 2.9) 50 a) Fresh-fallen rubber seeds (b) Setting seeds on sawdust-mounted germination bed (c) Various stages of germination of rubber seed (d) Germinating seeds Figure 2.9 Germinating rubber seeds NURSERIES AND THE PRODUCTION OF PLANTING MATERIALS A nursery is a special area, where planting materials are raised for transplanting into the field. A rubber nursery can be considered as a factory producing planting materials. Objectives of Setting Up a Nursery The objectives of establishing a rubber nursery are to: • nurture and raise high quality planting materials in large scale • prepare advance-aged planting materials, if necessary 51 • ensure that planting materials transplanted into the field achieve high initial establishment success • reduce costs of plantation development by reducing failures at the initial stage • obtain plants in the field reaching early maturity Choice of Nursery Site Rubber nursery is divided into two categories - ground nursery and polybag nursery. In a ground nursery, the plants are planted on the ground, whereas in a polybag nursery, the plants are planted in the polybags arranged in rows in a nursery. In selecting a nursery site, the following factors must be considered. • The soil must be well structured and textured (for ground nursery only) • There must be a good source of water supply • The land must be flat or slightly sloping • Water table should be below 75 cm from the surface (for ground nursery only) • The land should be an open area (not under shade) • It must be free from root disease source • Preferably having good infrastructure Type of Nursery There are no less than eleven types of nursery producing various types of planting materials. The commonly practised ones are: • Budstick multiplication nursery (ground nursery) • Budded stump nursery (ground nursery) • Budded stump in polybag nursery • Young budding nursery • High budding nursery • Core stump nursery (ground nursery) Establishment of Nursery A nursery site must be cleared and cleaned of all vegetations. This includes removal of tree stumps and roots. For a ground nursery, the land must be ploughed twice, followed by harrowing and rotovation or harrowing once. Basal fertiliser of 250 kg/ha ground magnesium limestone is broadcast just before the second ploughing and 625 kg/ha of rock phosphate, such as Christmas Island Rock Phosphate (CIRP) just before rotovation. For a polybag nursery, tilling of land is unnecessary. Instead, filled polybags are laid 52 in straight double rows as soon as the site is lined and cleared (Figure 2.10). For large nurseries, watering system such as the sprinkler or the Sumi Sansui be installed. Planting distances for the various nurseries described above are shown in Table 2.30. (c) Maintenance of seedlings in polybag (d) Polybag nursery Figure 2.10 Establishment of polybag nursery 53 TABLE 2.30 SUGGESTED PLANTING DISTANCES IN RUBBER NURSERIES Type of nursery Planting distance (cm) Approximate density per hectare Budstick multiplication 120 x 120 6.944 Budded stumps 60 x 15 111,111 Budded stump in polybag 96 x 18* 115,740 Young budding 96 x 18* 115,740 High budding 180 x 25* 44,444 Core stump 180x70 7,936 "Double rows Budstick multiplication nursery. In a budstick multiplication nursery, planting holes of 45 cm x 45 cm x 45 cm size are dug at each marked out planting point. Polybag buddings (budded stumps in polybags or young buddings in polybags) are used as starting materials. Although other materials can be used, budded stumps in polybags and young buddings are able to produce budsticks at a faster rate. Polybag buddings are then transplanted into the prepared planting holes. Budded stump nursery. A budded stump nursery, which is also a ground nursery has planting rows marked at intervals of 60 cm, along two opposite boundaries (Figure 2.11). Lining ropes marked with a planting distance of 15 cm are stretched along planting rows already marked. A rounded sharp-pointed stick is used to punch a cavity of 8 cm deep (depth may vary according to the length of the radical of the germinated seed to be transplanted) in the soil at every point marked along the lining rope. Germinated seeds are then placed in the carvities with the radicals downward. The cavities are refilled by gently pressing the soil around the seeds. Seeds with twisted radicals should not be transplanted. The seeds must not be detached from the radicals during the transplanting operation. Figure 2.11 Ground nursery 54 Budded s tumps in polybags nursery. Polybags of 18 cm x 38 cm layflat dimensions are filled with suitable soil, which has been mixed with rock phosphate at 56 g per bag of soil. Planting rows are marked at intervals of 96 cm along two opposite boundaries of the nursery. A40-cm strip of the soil along each planting row is roughly levelled to facilitate proper placement of the polybags. At each planting row (where the levelled strip is) two rows of filled polybags are placed. The polybags can be kept upright by slightly mounting the soil at the base or by stretching galvanised wires or by fixing wooden beroties along the sides. To facilitate transplanting, the soil in the polybags is first watered. A round sharp-end hardwood stick, the size of which should be slightly larger than the tap root of the budded stump to be transplanted, is used. The tap roots are planted with their tips 5 cm above the base of the polybags. Budded stumps with longer roots are pruned off to fit into the polybags. Budded stumps with twisted or very short tap roots are discarded. After measuring the tap root of the budded stump with the above stick, it is pierced into the soil to the required depth. The tap root of the budded stump and is then placed into the cavity. Water is again poured into the bag to close up the cavity and to prevent air pocket around the tap root (Figure 2.12). (a) Extracting budded stump (b) Selection of budded (c) Prunning of tap root stump (d) Placing tap root in (e) Arranging polybags in two (f) Budded stump with new polybag rows shoot Figure 2.12 Transplanting budded stumps into polybags 55 Young budding nursery. Preparation and laying of polybags in a young budding nursery are the same as for the budded stumps in polybags nursery. But in this type of nursery, germinated seeds are transplanted into the polybags, to be raised as seedling stocks for subsequent budding. Using a flat sharp-end piece of wood or bamboo, a cavity is made in the soil in the polybag, large and deep enough to fit in the radical and the seed. The germinated seed is placed in the cavity with the radical downward. The cavity is refilled with soil and carefully pressed. The seed must be fully covered with soil. High budding nursery. Preparation and laying of the polybags for a high budding nursery are the same as described earlier, except that polybags are bigger, with layflat dimensions of 25 cm x 50 cm and the inter-row distance is 180 centimetres. Germinated high quality clonal seeds such as PBIG/GG6 or PBIG/GG7 are transplanted into the polybags. The technique of transplanting is the same as described earlier. They are raised as stock plants for subsequent budding. Core s tump nursery. In the preparation of a core stump nursery, a trench of 30 cm wide and 45 cm deep is dug along each planting row. Polybag young buddings are placed in the trench at 45 cm apart. The trench is refilled with soil, incorporating 56 g of rock phosphate per point (Figure 2.13). (a) Preparing trenches for polybag buddings (b) Transplanting polybag buddings into prepared trenches Figure 2.13 Preparing core stump nursery 56 Maintenance of Nursery Watering of the plants is essential, especially for the polybag nurseries. Using the sprinkler or Sumi Sansui system, water is released twice daily for a total of two hours. Weeds are regularly controlled, initially by manual weeding. Herbicides are only used when the plants are at least two months old, and when the leaves have hardened. Spraying of Paracol at 2 litres in 450 litres of water per hectare should give satisfactory control of nursery weeds. Thinning out runts, genetic yellows, defective and chronically diseased plants are carried out from time to time. Manuring is done following specific schedules according to the type of nursery. Budstick multiplication nursery. Fertiliser is applied according to schedule shown in Table 2.31. The scion shoot is allowed to grow until 60-90 cm of brown bark has been formed. The scion stem is then cut-back at a height of 60 or 90 cm, just above a whorl of buds. Several side shoots will emerge, but only four or five vigorous ones are retained to form branches. Budsticks can be obtained by pruning back; as the snags left behind will again regenerate more shoots. Budsticks with green to dark green bark are normally used. After repeated pruning, the plant gives a bush-like crown formation. This is why this nursery is sometimes known as the bush nursery. Each budstick multiplication nursery should be productive for at least ten years. TABLE 2.31 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR BUDSTICK MULTIPLICATION NURSERY Time of (month after planting) Types of fertiliser Dosage (g per plant) 2 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 42 3 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 42 4 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 42 5 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 42 7 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 42 g Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 42 11 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 42 13 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 42 15 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 42 After fifteen months and onwards, fertiliser application is continued after each harvesting of budsticks. As soon as the budsticks are harvested, the leaf petioles are removed by pruning to avoid loss of water in the wood. Both the scale and the axillary buds on the budstick are usable. To facilitate packing, budsticks are cut to 30 cm length and usually 57 contain an average of two buds per stick. If the budsticks are to be kept overnight and longer, 1 cm at both ends must be sealed in molten wax to slow down the drying process. Budsticks are packed in cardboard or plywood boxes, interlayered by 10% damp sawdust. They should be kept in a cool place, but not exceeding a week. Where possible, budsticks must be used fresh (Figure 2.14). (a) Scion stem ready for cutback (b) Advanced stage of green budstick nursery (c) Trimmed budsticks (d) Dipping budstick ends in molten wax (e) Packing budsticks in cardboard box (f) Packed budsticks ready for transportation Figure 2.14 Producing green budsticks 58 Budded s tump nursery. Fertiliser is applied according to schedule (Table 2.32). The seedling stocks are green-budded at five to six months old. After three weeks, the successful budded plants are extracted. The stem of each plant is cut-back at 5 cm from the bud eye, and the cut end sealed in molten wax. The tap root is pruned off to 30-45 cm, while the side roots are all pruned off flush. The tap root is then dipped in IBA root stimulant formulation. If the budded stumps are to be transported to a long distance, they should be packed in 10% damped sawdust, at fifty stumps per bundle (Figure 2.15). TABLE 2.32 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR BUDDED STUMP NURSERY Time of application (month after planting) Types of fertiliser Dosage (g per plant) 2 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 60 3 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 60 4 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 60 5 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 60 Budded s tumps in polybags nursery. Fertiliser in applied according to schedule (Table 2.33). The scion shoot is allowed to grow until two whorls of hardened leaves have been formed. The material is then ready for transplanting (Figure 2.16). TABLE 2.33 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR BUDDED STUMP IN POLYBAGS NURSERY Time of application (month after planting) Types of fertiliser Dosage (g per plant) 1 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 28 3 Equivalent Mixture Magnesium X 28 Young budding nursery. Fertiliser is given according to schedule (Table 2.34). The seedling stocks are young-budded at ten to twelve weeks old. The stocks of successful buddings are cut-back. The scion shoots are allowed to grow until two whorls or hardened leaves have been formed. By this time, the tap roots may have penetrated the ground, and may require tailing. Two weeks before transplanting, the polybags are slightly lifted to severe the roots ground level. Watering must be continued until the materials are taken out of the nursery (Figure 2.17). 59 60 Figure 2.16 Polybags budded stump nursery where the scion shoots have emerged to two hardened whorls of leaves and ready for transplanting TABLE 2.34 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR YOUNG BUDDING NURSERY Time of application Type and dosage of fertiliser After transplantina aerminated seeds in oolvbaas 1-8 weeks (twice weekly) Spraying of foliar feed and fungicides mixture of Bayfolan = 15 ml + Dithane M-45 = 10 g + Daconil - 12 g + Water = 4.5 litres 2-6 weeks (weekly) NPKMg @ 15:15:6.4 with soluble phosphate 56 g + 4.5 litres water = 40 - 60 ml per polybag Stock plants at one whorl Staae After cut-back of stock Plant 2 weeks and onwards (twice weekly) Or* Slow release fertiliser such as Nurseryace or Kokei = 7 g per polybag Spraying of foliar feed and fungicides mixture of Bayfolan = 15ml + Dithane M-45 = 10 g + Daconil = 12 g + Water = 4.5 litres 4 weeks and onwards (weekly) Scion reaches copper- bronze leaflet staae NPKMg @ 15:15:6.4 with soluble phosphate 56 g + 4.5 litres water = 40- 60 ml per polybag Or* Slow release fertiliser such as Nurseryace or Kokei = 7 g per polybag *When there is shortage of labour 61 (a) Spraying of foliar fertiliser and fungicides mixture (c) Applying slow release fertiliser (e) Young budding plants of two whorls ready for transplanting (b) Applying slurry fertiliser (d) Seedling stocks ready for young budding (f) Feeder root mass found on young budding materials which can assist in their early establishment in the field Figure 2.17 Manuring young budding materials 62 High budding nursery. At the moment, the fertiliser schedule recommended for young budding nursery is also used for the high budding nursery. The stock plants are green-budded at five to six months old. Budding is done at a height of 100 centimetres. Four weeks after budding, the top portion of successful budded plants are cut-back and the scions are allowed to grow to one or two hardened whorls of leaves for transplanting. Prior to that, tailing is also done as described earlier. Again, watering must be continued until the materials are taken out of the nursery. High budding materials have two productive stem components. Upon maturity, the stems or trunks will have 100 cm of good clonal seedling materials at the lower part, and 200 cm of budded materials above them. This allows for early tapping, as, by nature the seedling tree tapers upwards and the bottom portion reaches maturity earlier (Figure 2.18). Core s tump nursery. Fertiliser is applied according to schedule (Table 2.35). As the scion shoots grow, side branches may also appear, which must be pruned off. This is to obtain clean stems of 210-240 cm for exploitation later on. Diseases and pests are also controlled when necessary. The plants can be transplanted at 12-18 months old. The stems are cut-back at a height of 240 cm, just above a whorl of buds. The cut ends are treated with suitable wound dressing. The stems are then painted white using dehydrated lime (1 kg + 1 litre water) to prevent scorching of the bark. At the same time, the tap roots are pruned off (tailing) to 45-60 cm, with a root pruner (oil palm fruit harvesting chisel). The plants, now called core stumps (maxi stumped buddings with soil cores), can be extracted for field transplanting, when the topmost buds have broken (bud-break stage). This takes approximately 10-14 days after cut-back. The stumps can also be left in the nursery much longer until all the leaves at the top whorl have hardened, thus, giving flexibility to the time of transplanting such materials. Care must be taken to prevent the soil core surrounding the roots from breaking up. These are categorised as advance-aged planting materials, in view their large stem size. They are expected to be brought into tapping much earlier (Figure 2.19). TABLE 2.35 MANURING SCHEDULE FOR CORE STUMP NURSERY Time of application Type of fertiliser Dosage per plant Immediately after planting Nursery ace* 14 g (2 pellets) Every six months Nurseryace* 14 g (2 pellets) "Kokei can also used, but every three months. The fertiliser is slightly buried in the soil, very close to the plant. 63 (a) Successfully high budding (b) High budding at one whorl stage (a) Cutting-back scion stem to height of 240 cm (b) Manual extraction of white- and apply wound dressing to the cut end washed core stumps (c) Extracting core stumps with the help of an (d) Core stumps at one whorl stage excavator at bud-break stage after planting (e) Core stumps material planted in the field Figure 2.19 Production of core stumps 65 ROOT INDUCTION Growth of rubber tree depends mainly on its roots, especially the side ones, which bear the feeding roots. When preparing budded stumps for transplanting, all the side roots are normally pruned off flush with the tap roots to facilitate planting. Therefore, early and fast re-emergence of the side roots in abundant quantity after planting is most important, to assist in the sprouting of the scions, and subsequently in the growth of the plants (Table 2.36). With good root system, the plants are able to uptake water and nutrient solution efficiently. This indirectly influences the overall growth of the tree. By using plant growth regulators, such as IBA (Indolebutyric acid), the above objectives can be achieved (Figure 2.20). TABLE 2.36. EFFECT OF IBA 2000 ROOT PRODUCTION OF BUDDED STUMPS OF DIFFERENT GIRTH SIZES Girth diameter Treatment Mean dry weight of roots (g) (cm) 2 weeks 4 weeks 8 weeks 1.25 Control 0.23(100) 0.27(100) 0.48(100) IBA (2000 ppm) 0.53(230) 0.75(278) 1.42(296) 2.50 Control 0.27(100) 0.36(100) 0.42(100) IBA (2000 ppm) 0.30(111) 0.72(200) 1.57(374) 3.75 Control 0.00(100) 0.29(100) 0.47(100) IBA (2000 ppm) 0.13(130) 0.74(255) 1.36(289) 5.00 Control - 0.31(100) 0.55(100) IBA (2000 ppm) - 0.83(268) 1.64(298) The clone budded was RRIM 600 Figures within brackets indicate percentage response of control IBA Formulation To prepare the formulation, dilute 2 g of IBA (product of Sigma Chemicals, USA) in 10 ml of absolute alcohol. Mix 1 kg of kaolin powder with 250 ml of water and 750 ml of 50% (commercial) alcohol, separately. Then mix all the ingredients thoroughly in a blender; and dry the mixture in an oven overnight at 70 °C until it turns to powder. The powder can be kept for a long period, provided it is not exposed to light. In this formulation, the quantity of IBA in kaolin is 2,000 parts per million (ppm). 66 (a) Without IBA 2000 treatment (b) With IBA 2000 treatment Figure 2.20 Effect of IBA on root development of budded stumps Application Method The IBA formulation must be diluted before use. To dilute it, dissolve 1 kg of the powder in 1,050 ml of water and 750 ml of 50% alcohol to obtain a solution of 1:1.8 powder/ solution. Pour the mixture into a special cylinder. Dip the tap root of the budded stump into the cylinder containing the mixture, and allow it to dry under shade before transplanting or packing. The remainder of the diluted mixture, if any, can be kept for use later, but not exceeding three months. 67 The oldest rubber tree growing in Kuala Kangsar, Perak. This specimen came from the original batch of seedlings from Brazil. 68 CHAPTER 3 SOILS AND LAND PREPARATION Soil is the uppermost layer of the earth crust, which is formed by partial or complete disintegration or decomposition of parent materials, subject to various degrees of weathering. The composition of soil is 45% mineral particles, 25% soil air, 25% water and 5% organic material. Although there are plants that can survive without soil, the majority of them, including rubber, need soil as a medium for growth. Factors Influencing Soil Formation The formation of soil depends on factors such as parent materials, vegetation, climate, topography and time. This means that the principle of soil formation is the action of climate on parent materials and vegetation, modified by topography, over a period of time. The interaction of similar weathering process with different parent materials produces different kinds of soil. It is also true that the development of the same parent materials under different climatic regimes and vegetation can also result in the formation of different soils. Topography determines the ease of rain water penetration into the ground and the drainage of water from specific areas. Topography has therefore a modifying influence on the degree of weathering and the soil that is formed. As the climate and vegetation do not vary very much between north and south of the Peninsular, Sabah and Sarawak, the type of soils formed in Malaysia depends mainly on the parent materials and topography. Parent Materials Parent materials are the main factor in soil formation. In fact, they are the basis of soil type. They are mostly made up of various types of rocks, as listed below. Intrusive rock - granite, granodiorite, gabbro and serpentinite Extrusive rock - rhyolite or dacite, andesite and basalt Sedimentary rock - conglomerate Hybrid rock - carbonaceous shale Chemical origin rock - limestone and quartzite Metamorphic rock - slate, phyllite and schist 69 Weathering and Soil Formation Soils are formed from mixtures of fragmented and partially or fully weathered rocks, mineral and organic matter in varying proportions and are dynamic in character. They reach an equilibrium stage with the environment after a long period of exposure to a given state of conditions. The fragmentation of rocks and parent materials is the result of climatic forces. Weathering is either chemical or physical. In physical weathering, the parent material is broken down by environmental conditions, such as temperature, running water, and action of plant roots. Chemical weathering causes disintegration or changes of substances present in the parent material, often the result of biological and chemical activities. Soil Profile The degree of interaction of physical and chemical processes influences soil genesis in two steps - accumulation of materials and differentiation of horizons in a profile. In creating a particular profile, oxidation may cause discolouration of fragments of the parent rock to a considerable depth. Clay minerals and iron compounds leached from the upper part of the profile may be concentrated lower down the profile. Such distinctive successive layers approximately parallel to the ground surface and produced by soil- forming processes are called horizons, which characterise the soil. By colour, chemical tests, grain-size analysis and other criteria, soil profiles can be sub-divided into many horizons and sub-horizons, and by comparison of their nature and intensity, the soil can be classified. Thus, a typical profile usually consists of five main horizons, from the surface down to the unaltered rock (Figure 3.1). f"u^?^T'£J'*j;|pjFjCjBBE*»v" 0 F r e s n o r partially decomposed organic matter • A Abundant roots and accumulation of humus in a primarily mineral horizon, clay, carbonates and iron leached to deeper horizons - B Finely divided humus and clay accumulated from the A horizon B Accumulated clay, iron oxide and some humus, prismatic or blocky structure - C Slightly altered parent material R Unaltered rock material Figure 3.1 Atypical soil profile 70 Process of Soil Formation Not all the five main horizons are seen in a single soil profile. Depending on the degree of development, three or sometimes only two horizons are present. The differentiation of horizons is determined by the combination and balance of the physical processes, which in turn, governed by the relative strength of the five main soil formation factors. The relative importance of each process is reflected in the final character of the soil. As the basic physical and chemical processes are much controlled by the main soil formation factors, especially that of climate on a regional basis, different sets of combinations of these processes are specific to different geographical and climatic zones. The more important soil-forming processes influencing the development of soils in Peninsular Malaysia are described below. Latosolisation. This is the most common process. Under abundant rainfall and high temperatures of the tropics, there are great weathering forces. Hydrolysis and oxidation are rapid and the soluble bases of calcium, potassium, magnesium and sodium are leached away quickly. Due to the mobility of these cations, the pH is lowered and this low acidity condition is worsened by the rapid decay of the organic residues and the immediate release of the bases in organic combination. As a result, the solubility of silica is enhanced, retarding those of iron, manganese and aluminium. With good drainage, intense oxidation takes place. As weathering proceeds, the resultant profiles are high in sesquioxides and low in silica. The residual and accumulated iron produce very deep bright red coloured soil such as the Kuantan, Segamat, Prang and Langkawi series. Laterisation. As weathering processes occur further on the latosol, replacement action of silica by hydroxyl groups takes place and hydrated iron and aluminium oxides are formed. These oxides called goethite and bauxites are concretionary in nature and they constitute laterites or ironstones, which range 1-50 cm in size. These are commonly found in many rubber-growing soils of Peninsular Malaysia. Sometimes, such laterites, when cemented, form thick, hard and impenetrable ironstone pans, which are common in Melaka, Gajah Mati, Tavy and Changloon series. Ground water laterisation. At times, ground water laterites can be formed on low terrain areas due to fluctuating ground water table. This influences a rapid alternating oxidation-reduction action on the lower lying materials such as the parent material, resulting in the formation of ground water laterites. This is a notable feature in some of the riverine alluvial soils and soils derived from sedimentary materials such as the Batu Anam series. 71 Podzolisation. This is only confined to soils, such as the Rudua and Rusilia series. With high organic cycle, low terrain, which does not drain water quickly, and sandy medium, which eases leaching, there is considerable removal of salts and carbonates. This is followed by marked release and transfer and redeposition of organic humic acids and sesquioxides, especially iron, down the lower lying layers, leaving a whitish bleached A2 horizon in the upper 30 cm layer and dark, slightly reddish-brown layer of redeposited mixed organic acids and iron oxides in the lower layers. Podzolic process . In the higher terrain areas and under abundant rainfall, podzolisation process is modified and gives way podzolic influences. Under better drained conditions and a more intense weathering process, easily weathered minerals are changed to secondary clay, oxides and iron. The bases are lost by leaching segregation of insoluble oxides as amorphous materials occur. Clays are formed in its place and vertically moved at depths so that a textural B horizon, with bright or yellowish-red colour, occurs. Soils with such diagnostic horizons with clay formation, movement and accumulation at depths are featured in Rengam, Jerangau, Bungor and Munchong series. The textural B horizon is usually thick and as such, these soils are very deep, extending up to 150 cm and more. Gleization. This process is influenced by a high permanent water table on low terrain. There is an excess of soil moisture due to poor drainage, which is either due to the soil characteristics or because the soil is situated in low-lying area. As a result, there are little alteration processes, and undecomposed organic layer lies on the surface, with a lower layer retaining its grey colour due to little alteration in deposited materials. This is a feature in Kangkong and Selangor series soils. But, going inwards from the coast, where the terrain is higher, fluctuating water table causes alternating dry and wet conditions. Oxidation of iron-rich spots takes place, resulting in red, yellow or brown streaks of iron mottles in the profiles of Briah and Sitiawan series. Soil Colour Colour of the soil must be determined when the soil is moist. The colour may be uniform or may vary, the most common being bright, dark or mottled, depending on drainage. Colour is also determined by the type of minerals present in the soil. For example, red shows that there is goethite or hermatite and and black shows there is manganese oxide, montmorilonite or organic materials. 72 Soil Texture Soil texture is a measure of the relative proportions of the various types of soil particles in the solid phase of the soil. The particles are graded by their diameter size and a name is given for each type. Table 3.1 gives the international particle names and specifications of soil texture. TABLE 3.1 SOIL FRACTIONS AND THEIR DIAMETER SIZE LIMITS Fraction name Diameter size limit (mm) Gravel >20 Coarse sand 2.0-0.2 Fine sand 0.20-0.02 Silt 0.02-0.002 Clay <0.002 The texture of soil determines whether the soil can retain water and nutrients. It is therefore, considered important in terms of soil fertility. Soil texture can be roughly estimated by feeling with the fingers. Too much clay or too much sand in the soil is undesirable for plant growth, including rubber. Therefore, a right combination of the two is needed. Texture depends very much on the parent material. For example, basalt produces clay soils, while granite produces sandy clay soils. The higher the degree of weathering, the more clayey is the resulting soils. The textural names of soils are as listed below, while the textural classes are as shown in Figure 3.2. • Clay • Clayey loam • Sand • Sandy clay • Sandy clay loam • Sandy loam • Loam • Loamy sand • Silt • Silty clay • Silty loam • Silty clay loam 73 100% Clay •6- 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ^ % Sand Figure 3.2 Soil textural classes guide Soil Structure Soil structure refers to soil particle aggregates based on the aggregate that can be easily broken under very slight pressure. For example, sandy soil is very friable in nature, and connot be formed into any structure, thus it is said to be structureless. Unlike clay soil which cannot be easily broken up. Clay soil is considered to be of very poor structure, as it is too blocky. Structure influences the supply of water, air and nutrients for plant growth. Ideally, there should be an assortment of fine and coarse aggregates arranged in a pattern that will allow adequate water storage and aeration. The aggregates must be stable enough so that the structure can be preserved for a long time. Figure 3.3 displays some common soil structures in Peninsular Malaysia soils. 74 Sub-angular blocky Angular blocky Granular Platy Prismatic Columnar Figure 3.3 Various types of soil pebbler Soil Series It is important to classify soils in order to efficiently exploit them. Classification of soils also helps to determine their suitability and the type or amount of agro-management input to be given. In rubber cultivation, soil management is important to maximise yield of a clone in a particular area, and this depends partly on the soil series. A soil series can be defined as a group of soils, similar in profile properties, formed from parent material of the same geological origin. Table 3.2 describes a number of soil series found in rubber-growing areas of Peninsular Malaysia. 75 TABLE 3.2 SOME SOIL SERIES IN RUBBER-GROWING AREAS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA Series Parent material Colour Texture Structure Consistency Batu Anam Shale Pale yellow to light grey Clay to silty clay Strong, medium to coarse angular blocky to prismatic Firm and very firm Durian Shale Strong brown to yellowish red Silty clay to clay Moderate, medium angular blocky to prismatic Firm and very firm Gajah Mati Shale Strong brown Clay loam Moderate, medium and fine sub-angular blocky Very friable Jeram Shale Strong brown to yellowish red Sandy clay loam to clay Strong coarse granular and fine sub-angular blocky Friable to firm Kuala Brang Shale Dark greyish brown to light olive grey Fine sandy loam to clay loam Strong medium granular to weak very coarse sub-angular blocky Friable to firm Melaka Shale Brownish yellow or redder Clay loam to fine sandy clay Strong, fine and medium sub-angular blocky Very friable Munchong Shale Yellowish brown to strong brown Silty clay loam to silty clay Moderate to strong fine and medium sub-angular blocky Friable to firm with depth Pohoi Shale Pale brown to variegated yellow Clay loam to clay Moderate, medium and coarse crumbs and granular to strong, coarse prismatic Friable to very firm Prang Shale Yellowish red Heavy clay Moderate to strong, fine and medium sub-angular blocky Very friable Rengam Granite Brownish yellow to yellowish brown Coarse sandy clay loam to coarse sandy clay Weak to moderate, medium sub-angular blocky Friable Jerangau Granodiorite Strong brown to yellowish red Fine sandy clay loam to fine sandy clay Moderate to strong, fine and medium sub-angular blocky Friable to firm with depth Kuantan Basalt Strong brown to yellowish red Clay to heavy clay Moderate to strongly developed, medium granular and sub-angular blocky Very friable Segamat Andesite Yellowish red to red Clay to heavy clay Strongly developed medium sub-angular blocky Very friable TABLE 3.2 SOME SOIL SERIES IN RUBBER-GROWING AREAS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA (contd.) Series Parent material Colour Texture Structure Consistency Kulai Rhyolites and volcanic tuffs Pale yellow brown to strong brown Loam to silty clay Weak, angular blocky Firm Yong Peng Dacite Strong brown to yellowish red Clay loam to clay Moderate, medium sub-angular blocky to strong angular blocky Friable Seremban Schist Reddish yellow to yellowish red Fine sandy clay loam to fine sandy clay Fine sandy clay loam to fine sand clay Friable to firm Batang Merbau Schist and quartzite Yellowish brown Fine sandy loam to sandy clay loam Moderate, medium sub-angular blocky Friable to firm Bungor Quartzite or shale Yellowish brown of brownish Fine sandy clay loam to fine sandy clay Strong, medium sub-angular blocky Friable to firm Serdang Sandstone Strong brown to yellowish yellow Coarse sandy loam to sandy clay loam Weak to moderate, fine and medium sub-angular blocky Friable Kedah Quartzite and sandstone Strong brown Sandy loam to sandy clay Weak to moderate, medium and fine sub-angular blocky Friable to firm Harimau Older alluvium Yellowish brown to brownish yellow Sandy clay loam to sandy clay Weak to moderate, medium sub-angular blocky Friable to firm Ulu Tiram Older alluvium Yellowish brown Sandy clay loam to gravelly loam Weak, medium crumbs to weak medium sub-angular blocky Friable to firm Tampoi Older alluvium Reddish yellow to yellowish red Sandy loam to sandy clay loam Weak crumbs to coarse sub-angular blocky Friable to firm Klau Sub-recent alluvium Yellowish brown to brownish yellow Sandy clay loam to sandy clay Weak to moderate, medium coarse sub-angular blocky Friable to firm Holyrood Sub-recent alluvium Yellowish brown Sandy loam to sandy clay loam Weak, fine sub-angular blocky Very friable TABLE 3.2 SOME SOIL SERIES IN RUBBER-GROWING AREAS OF PENINSULAR MALAYSIA (contd.) Series Parent material Colour Texture Structure Consistency Sogomana Sub-recent alluvium Light grey to white Silty clay to clay Weak, coarse prismatic breaking to angular blocky Firm Sitiawan Sub-recent alluvium Pale yellow to yellow Clay Moderate, coarse angular blocky Firm Lunas Sub-recent alluvium Dark greyish brown to light grey Coarse sand clay loam Weak, fine crumbs to moderate weak, very coarse angular and sub-angular blocky Very friable to firm Sungai Buloh Recent riverine alluvium Dark brown to yellowish brown and yellow Coarse sand Structureless to weak, fine crumbs Loose to very friable Briah Marine alluvium Light brown to brownish grey Silty clay loam or silty clay Strong or moderate sub-angular blocky Friable for with depth Selangor Marine alluvium Dark greyish brown or greyish brown Silty clay Weak to moderate, coarse prismatic or angular blocky Friable to firm with depth Linau Marine alluvium Dark brown Organic clay to muck with some decayed plant remains Weakly structured Friable to firm with depth Senai Gabbro Brown to yellowish red Clay Moderate, fine and medium to moderate sub-angular Friable to firm Subang Organic enriched alluvial deposit over compact sand Dark brown to very pale brown Organic sandy loam to sand Strong, medium granular and sub-angular blocky to structureless Friable Organic clay and mucks Organic deposits accumulation Not fully investigated yet Peat Organic deposits accumulation Not fully investigated yet Soil Limitation While some classes of soils have properties desirable for growth of rubber, the poor classes have properties which limit optimum growth and performance. The common limitations are as described below Very serious limitations: • Slopes steeper than 16 degrees • Massive thick hard-pan within 23 cm of the surface • More than 75% rock outcrops in a unit area • Permanent water table within 23 cm of the surface • Acid peat layer thicker than 23 cm • More than 90% sand • Very low nutrient level Serious limitations: • Slopes steeper than 9 degrees but below 16 degrees • Massive thick hard-pan between 20-50 cm of surface • Between 50 to 75% rock outcrops in a unit area • Permanent water table between 20-50 cm of the surface • Very compact soil • Very sandy or clayey • Susceptible to moisture stress • Low nutrient level. Less serious or minor limitations: • Weak structure within 90 cm of surface • Moderate drainage conditions • Massive thick hard-pan below 50 cm from surface or loosely packed gravels within 50 cm from surface • Less than 50% rock outcrops in a unit area • Susceptible to flooding • Susceptible to erosion • Below optimum nutrient level. 79 Soil Limitation Classification Based on the above information, the following soil limitation classifications are recommended for rubber cultivation: • Class I - Having no limitation to rubber cultivation • Class II - Having one or more limitations to rubber cultivation • Class III - Having at least one serious limitation • Class IV - Having more than one serious limitation for rubber cultivation • Class V - Having at least one very serious limitation for rubber cultivation Land suitability is also categorised into orders. Two orders are recognised - suitable (S) and unsuitable (N) for rubber cultivation. The sub-division are as follows: • S1 - Highly suitable for rubber cultivation • S2 - Moderately suitable for rubber cultivation • S3 - Marginally suitable for rubber cultivation • N1 - Currently unsuitable for rubber cultivation • N2 - Permanently unsuitable for rubber cultivation Soil Productivity Classification Studies have shown that yield of rubber is dependent on soil properties. Munchong, Rengam and Jerangau series have good physical properties and therefore the yields are higher. Selangor and Briah series have very poor physical properties, and hence poor yield. The physical properties of Holyrood and Tampoi are said to be intermediate, thus, the yields are also intermediate. Based on the above information, soils are divided into five productivity classes (Table 3.3). TABLE 3.3 SOIL PRODUCTIVITY CLASSES Class Yield category (kg/ha/year) Soil series IA > 1,350 Munchong, Prang, Kuantan, Segamat IB 1,250-1,350 Rengam, Jerangau, Yong Peng, Bungor II 1,150-1,250 Senai, Harimau, Batang Merbau, Subang, Klau, Serdang III 1,050-1,150 Ulu Tiram, Pohoi, Holyrood, Lunas, Kuala Berang, Tampoi IV 1,000-1,050 Batu Anam, Durian, Seremban, Melaka, Gajah Mati, Kedah, Marang V < 1,000 Briah, Selangor, Sungai Buloh, Linau, Peat 80 Desirable Soil Properties for Rubber Cultivation Soils have different physical, chemical and physiographical combinations. Their suitabilities for rubber cultivation also vary. The desirable properties for rubber cultivation are listed below: • Soil depth of up to 100 cm • Well drained • Good soil aeration • Good structure • Able to retain water and nutrients • Good texture - 35% clay and 30% sand • No peat or peat layer not thicker than 23 cm • Slopes not exceeding 16 degrees • Water table deeper than 100 cm from surface • At least medium status of NPKMg • Not deficient in minor nutrients • Level of pH around 4.5 • Not saline or no acid sulphate Agro-management Practices to Overcome Soil Limitations Different specific agro-management practices and inputs are required on different soils as a result of their limitations. These are summarised below: • Establishment of pure creeping legume cover crops for all situations • Terracing for slopes exceeding 16% • Silt-pittings or bundings for slopes below 16% • Contour ploughing only for slopes below 16% • Contour planting on slopes of 2-8% • Efficient drainage system for high water table clay soils • If mechanical ploughing is intended for heavy clay textured soils, it must be carried out at the correct soil moisture content • Avoid heavy crown clones for high water table areas, sandy and lateritic soils • Carry out extra and split application of fertilisers for the sandy textured and peaty soils 81 SOIL CONSERVATION Soil conservation can be considered as maintaining, protecting, and improving the soil for agricultural purposes. Crop productivity depends very much on the top soil, where plant nutrients are concentrated. As this rich layer is at the top of the soil surface, plant nutrients can easily be lost, removed or damaged by various natural processes. Objectives of Soil Conservation The objectives of soil conservation are therefore to: • reduce soil erosion • maintain and improve soil structure • maintain organic material content in the soil • utilise efficiently available water • maintain soil fertility by reducing nutrient loss, and to replace those that are lost Soil Erosion and Its Consequences Soil erosion is a natural process in which loss of rich top soil occurs by the action of rain, wind and sunlight. In the tropics, due to abundant rainfall, much of the erosion is caused by water. The degree of erosion then depends greatly on the amount of rainfall and the steepness of the terrain. When erosion occurs, the nutrient-rich top soil is washed away. This can affect plant growth and later, its yield. In areas where the terrain is too steep, more serious consequences can take place, such as exposure of tree crop roots followed by falling trees. Types of Erosion There are two main types of erosion, the geological and the accelerated erosion. Geological erosion is the erosion of land in its natural environment, without man's influence. It occurs naturally by the action of rain, wind, temperature variations, gravity and vegetation. In fact the present land relief of Malaysia is the result of geological erosion. It is an on-going process, and there is nothing much that we can do about it. 82 Accelerated erosion is mainly caused by man in his effort to bring about development by land clearing. Still, the chief agent of accelerated erosion is water. The various types of water erosion are discussed below: Sheet erosion. Sheet erosion is the uniform removal of a thin layer or sheet of top soil, by falling rain, followed by surface run-off removal. Usually it takes place unnoticed. It occurs on smooth surface and on uniform or regular slopes. Rill erosion. In their natural form, most soil surfaces are irregular with low and high places, such as runnels, furrows and mounds. When rain falls, water flows into depressions causing rill formation. The eroded soil surface can become deeper with time, leading to the formation of gully erosion (Figure 3.4 a). Gully erosion. Gully erosion is a more serious form of rill erosion. The soil surface becomes so deformed, with large ugly-looking scars, which sometimes make agricultural development almost impossible (Figure 3.4 b). Landslide. Landslide can be considered as a more serious form of gully erosion. Besides destroying the soil fertility, it causes damage to crops, properties, waterways, highways and probably lives, too. It normally occurs on very steep slopes of hills undergoing development and road cuttings. It causes the detachment of huge blocks of soil from the main hill during heavy and prolonged rainfall (Figure 3.4 c). Minimising Soil Erosion Soil erosion can be minimised by reducing the speed of running water and at the same time encouraging it to penetrate the soil, thus reducing surface run-off. Protecting the soil surface from direct rainfall, wind and sunlight also helps to reduce erosion. Steps to be considered to minimise the dangers of erosion are: • Contour terracing for slopes exceeding 11 degrees • Contour bunding for slopes below 11 degrees • Contour platforming for slopes below 11 degrees • Contour silt-pitting for slopes below 11 degrees • Contour ploughing where required • Contour planting where necessary • Mulching around crops • Cover cropping for all land situations (Figure 3.5 and Table 3.4) 83 a) Rill erosion b) Gully erosion c) Landslide erosion Figure 3.4 Various types of soil erosion 84 (a) Contour terracing (b) Contour bunding Figure 3.5 Contour terracing and bunding TABLE 3.4 EFFECT OF COVER CROPS ON REDUCTION OF SOIL EROSION Type of soil Quantity of rain (cm) Quantity of soil eroded (tonne/ha) Exposed* Grassed Nephrolepls" Rengam 4 - 5 292 103 44 Negligible Serdang 3°- 5° 325 132 177 59 * Bare land surface or no vegetation at all ** A type of fern 85 Soil Tillage Although no tilling is required for rubber cultivation, ploughing and harrowing can be carried out, if short term crops are to be inter-grown. The main aim of tilling is to reduce the compactness of the soil to facilitate root development at the initial stage of plant growth. But the soil can become compact, if ploughing is not properly carried out. If the soil is ploughed after a heavy downpour, it becomes more compact and hard. The soil must be allowed to dry sufficiently. As a guide, sandy soils such as the Sungai Buloh, Holyrood and Serdang series, can be ploughed two to three days after rainfall, while the medium soils (Rengam and Munchong series), four to five days and the clayey soils (Sitiawan dan Sogomana series), one week. Manuring Soil fertility has become the main factor in soil management. By maintaining high soil fertility, several conditions which assist in reducing erosion can be achieved. Good plant growth rate which covers the soil surface, also reduces rainsplash, surface run-off and at the same time preserve water in the soil for plant/crop usage. To achieve a high level of fertility, correct fertiliser must be adequately applied. This can be determined by soil and foliar analysis, fertiliser trials and crop growth survey. Such efforts can lead to a more specific fertiliser application known as discriminatory fertiliser usage. In crop cultivation, soil fertility is of utmost importance because; it determines the viability of the crop. Below are several factors concerning soil management that are considered important. • Knowing the most suitable time to carry out land development for rubber cultivation - planning, clearing, tilling, planting and others • Reducing soil erosion to the maximum • Utilising available organic fertiliser to the maximum • Increasing nutrient status of the soil by the use of chemical fertilisers • Mulching around crop where possible and suitable • Maintaining pure legume covers to the very end of their life cycles 86 TERRACING Terracing is the cutting of steps or paths horizontally on hill slopes following their contours. Terraces function as planting rows on hill slopes, since planting of rubber is done on and along them. Objectives of Terracing The objectives of constructing terraces on hill slopes are to: • reduce soil erosion • retain and preserve water in the soil • facilitate holing and planting operations • facilitate manuring • facilitate general field maintenance • facilitate movements on hill slopes Method of Terracing Terraces are constructed along contour lines marked out during field lining. This is to ensure that they are level. A cut is made into the hill slope, about 60 cm above or below the contour line, and the earth is pulled backward (downhill) to create a path of 1-1.5 m wide. This cut is continued to the end of the contour line. The spoil is heaped along the lower edge of the slope and given a beating to form a strong bund. The terrace should slope inward into the hill with a back drop of 25-30 cm from the horizontal or declining 10-20°, depending on the slope gradient (Figure 3.6). At intervals of 8 m along the terraces, earth-stops are made to check lateral flow of water, by leaving 30 cm width of uncut earth. Thirty metres of terrace length can be completed per man-day. For a large area mechanical terracing is more appropriate. A light bulldozer such as the D4 model fitted with a tilting blade that can cut 2-4 m width of terrace at the rate 100 m per hour is normally used. Earth-stop at 20 m intervals are sufficient for such terraces. Figure 3.6 Cross-section of terrace 87 The total length of terraces in a hectare of hilly area can be calculated, if the average distance between terraces is known, by the following formula: Total Length of Terrace = Area per hectare (m2) Average distance between terraces (m) Fixing Planting Points In view of the irregularity of the distances between terraces, it is advisable to make adjustments to the planting points (from the original distance of 2.5 m) where necessary for a more uniform planting density per hectare. This can be achieved by marking off all the terraces at 20 m intervals. At the beginning and end of every 20 m along the terraces, the horizontal distance between adjoining terraces is measured orthogonally (Figure 3.7). The measurements are then summed up, and in reference to Table 3.5, the planting distance along the 20 m mark is obtained, based on the planting density of 500 plants per hectare. First terrace Second terrace^. a 20 m 2 _ , - = t - Third terrace—^ b i : £ _- : 1° Figure 3.7 Layout for planting point adjustment along terrace TABLE 3.5 PLANTING POINTS FOR 500 PLANTS PER HECTARE ON TERRACE Sum of a,b,c,d (m) Average horizontal distances between terraces (m) Number of plants per 20 m terrace length Distance between planting points (m) 24.3-27.2 6.1-6.8 5 4.00 27.3-32.1 6.9-8.0 6 3.33 32.2-37.0 8.1-9.2 7 2.86 37.1-41.9 9.3-10.5 8 2.50 42.0-46.7 10.6-11.7 9 2.22 46.8-48.9 11.8-12.3 10 2.0 88 GROUND COVER CROPS In agricultural practices, exposed soil surface is most undesirable, as it can cause much damage to the top soil, rendering it no longer suitable for growing crops. The main planted crop, such as rubber, is insufficient to provide full coverage to the soil surface, especially during the first few years of establishment. Plants which are more densely populated are needed to perform such function. They are known as ground cover plants or ground covers. Ground covers can be defined as small plants, either planted or self-grown such a s weeds, catch crops and leguminous plants. Weeds Weeds can be defined as plants which are self-grown. Desirable weeds are those that utilise very little nutrients from the soil, but grow vigorously and return lots of green litter to the soil. Undesirable weeds are those that take up lots of nutrient but return very little litter to the soil. Most grasses, bracken, sedges and others come under this category of weeds. Among them, Imperata cylindrica and Mikania micrantha are regarded as very harmful to rubber growth. Their roots are believed to release toxic substance that inhibits growth of rubber. Only the desirable weeds should therefore be allowed to grow in the rubber plantation, while the undesirables are eradicated. Catch Crops Catch crops are short term crops, usually grown between rubber planting rows. They are mostly food crops, such as maize, groundnuts, soya bean, vegetables and others. They are able to provide temporary income to the farmers and at the same time function as cover crops. Such practice is only suitable during the first two or three years of rubber cultivation, because of the shading effect from rubber trees. Leguminous Plants Leguminous plants (Leguminoseae sp.) are those that can fix atmospheric nitrogen and convert it to nitrates, through the bacteria present in the root nodules of such plants. From the soil fertility point of view, this type of ground cover is most preferred. Legume covers are divided into two groups namely creepers and non-creepers. Non-creepers are further divided into bushy and prostrates (Table 3.6). 89 TABLE 3.6 SOME COMMON LEGUME COVER PLANT SPECIES Creepers Non-creepers Bushy Prostrates Calopogonium mucunoides Moghania macrophylla Stylosanthes gracilis Calopogonium caeruleum Tephrosia Candida Desmodium ovalifolium Centrosema pubescens Acasua villosa Desmodium groides Pueraria phaseoloides Crotalaria anagroides Classia obtusifolia Mucuna cochinchinensis Crotalaria striata Mimosa invisa Phaseolus pubescens Leucaena glauca Clitoria rubigonosa Among the legume covers, the creepers are preferred, as they cover the soil surface very fast. Their detailed descriptions are given in the later part of this Chapter. Advantages of creeping legume covers. Numerous advantages can be obtained by establishing creeping leguminous covers in the rubber plantations, and they are listed below: • Protect the soil surface, thus reducing soil erosion and direct sunlight (Table 3.7) • Assist in the preservation of water in the soil • Reduce soil temperature, thus delaying the decomposition of organic matter • Help to loosen the soil and facilitate aeration and drainage in the soil • Improve soil structure and other related physical properties • Add organic matter to the soil in the form of leaf litter • Fix atmospheric nitrogen and convert it to nitrate for plant usage • Encourage feeder root development near the soil surface, hence more efficient uptake of nutrients (Table 3.8) • Provide good nitrogen nutrition to rubber during the first two to five years of growth (Table 3.9) • Reduce cost in nitrogenous fertiliser • Reduce leaching losses of nutrients deep into the soil • Enhance growth of rubber, resulting in early maturity (Tables 3.10-3.11) • Increase crop yield (Table 3.12) • Improve bark renewal • Help to suppress weeds growth and thus reduce cost of weed control • Reduce overall field maintenance of rubber plantation • Assist in faster decomposition of old tree stumps, thus reducing root disease incidence in young plantings 90 TABLE 3.7 EFFECT OF COVER CROPS ON SOIL EROSION Type of cover Thickness of soil accumulated on terrace (cm) Pueraria phaseoloides 11.0 Grasses 12.5 Tephrosia Candida 14.0 Crotalaria anagroides 15.5 Exposed * 19.0 *No covers at all TABLE 3.8 EFFECT OF COVERS ON FEEDER ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF RUBBER Type of cover Weight of feeder roots (mg/1000 cc soil) Legume 623 Grasses 330 Mikania 251 TABLE 3.9 NUTRIENTS RETURNED TO THE SOIL IN FIVE YEARS BY TWO TYPES OF COVERS (KG/HA) Type of cover N P K Mg Legume 226-535 18-27 85-131 15-27 Grasses 24-65 31-16 31-86 5-9 TABLE 3.10 EFFECT OF COVERS ON GROWTH OF RUBBER FIVE YEARS AFTER PLANTING (CM) Type of cover Inland soil Coastal clay soil Legume 40 41 Grasses 36 40 Imperata cylindrica 18 24 91 TABLE 3.11 EFFECT OF COVERS ON THE IMMATURITY PERIOD OF RUBBER Type of cover Seremban series soil (months after planting) Melaka series soil (months after budding) Legume 61 56 Grasses 68 59 TABLE 3.12 EFFECT OF COVERS ON THE ACCUMULATED YIELD OF RUBBER (KG/HA) Type of cover 148 months 159 months Legume 10,145 11,843 Grasses 8,220 10,449 Disadvantages of legume creeping covers. Legume creeping covers also pose some drawbacks in rubber plantation. As living plants, they too compete with rubber for nutrient and water from the soil, space, sunlight and air. They provide sanctuary for certain rubber pests such as molluscs and insects. In view of their creeping nature, they climb up the rubber plants, choking and bending them. But the abundant advantages they give to rubber offset these disadvantages. Legume cover species. There are several species of creeping legumes, but only five are commonly planted in rubber plantations. Calopogonium mucunoides has medium size oval-shaped leaves and small-size seeds. It establishes very fast, but has a life span of below two years. Centrosema pubescens has small leaves, but larger seeds. It is slow to establish, but tolerates shade. Pueraria phaseoloides has large broad leaves and smallest seeds. It establishes fast and tolerates shade. Calopogonium caeruleum has also medium-size leaves, medium-size and flat seeds and is the most shade tolerant of all. Mucuna cochinchinensis has very large broad- shaped leaves and extra large seeds, it is very vigorous in growth but has a life span of below one year . To obtain a good ground cover with all the growth properties present, a mixture of the different species is recommended (Table 3.13). 92 TABLE 3.13 LEGUME COVER CROP SEED MIXTURES (KG/HA)* Legume species Mixture A Mixture B Mixture C Calopogonium mucunoides 2.9 4.1 1.8 Centrosema pubescens 1.2 - - Pueraria Phaseoloides 1.9 1.2 2.3 Calopogonium caeruleum - 0.7 0.7 Mucuna cochinchinensis - - 1.2 'Based on 80% germination, quantity to be increased accordingly if germination rate is lower Method of planting. For planting of legume covers, the land area must first be cleared and lined. On hill slopes terraces must be completed. V-shaped drills 2.5 cm deep are cut in the soil between rubber planting rows or terraces, the number of drills depending on the distance between the planting rows. The distance of the drills nearest to the planting rows should be 1.2 m and the distance between drills should be 1 -3 metres. For example, three drills are suggested between 5 m inter-rows, and four drills between terraces of 8 metres (Figure 3.8). On a hill slope, the top-most drill is laid along the terrace lip to provide protection along the filled portion of the terrace . Rock phosphate at 125 kg per hectare is applied in the drills. • • »^ • • Rubber 1.2m —-— Legume cover i.3m, 5 m Legume cover 1.3 nt ; Legume cover 1.2m | i- • • • • • Rubber 93 Figure 3.9 Planting out legume cover crop seeds 94 The seeds are mixed in a suitable container. They are then soaked in hot water at 75 °C (one part of cold water in two parts of boiling water) for two hours. After removing excess water, the seeds are innoculated with Rhizobium compost at 10 kg per 50 g packet of the compost. The treated seeds are then mixed with equal weight of rock phosphate. The seeds are sown in the drills and lightly covered with soil. Immediately after planting, pre-emergent herbicide, such as Lasso at 3 litres in 450 litres of water per hectare is blanket-sprayed (Figure 3.9). Maintenance of legume covers. After three to four weeks, work on legume cover purification must begin by manually removing weeds that emerge. Compound fertiliser containing NPKMg at 15:15:6:4% is applied on the covers at 63 kg per hectare (Figure 3.10). When the legumes have provided 10-20% coverage, the weeds are controlled by herbicides, such as 2.5 litres Paraquat + 1.2 litres Velpar K-51 in 450 litres of water per hectare. Pests of legume covers such as slugs and snails are controlled by poisoned bait, while the insect pests are controlled by spraying insecticides such as 48 g Dipterex SP or Sevin 85S in 20 litres of water. Rock phosphate is again dusted over the legume cover crops at 250 kg/ha/ year, when they are one, three and eight months old, and thereafter, annually. Legume cover crops are expected to be fully established in less than a year (Figure 3.10). (a) Applying NPKMg compound fertilisers (b) Dusting rock phosphate Figure 3.10 Manuring legume cover crops 95 Through breeding and selection, MRB succeded in developing a selection of latex-timber clones that excellent in rubber production as well as rubberwood production 96 CHAPTER 4 PLANTATION DEVELOPMENT Rubber plantation development is a huge undertaking as its operations involve labour force and agricultural machinery. The complexity depends on the size of the land area to be developed as completion of each field operation must coincide with the season. In Malaysia, rubber planting can be divided into two types i.e. new planting and replanting. New planting is defined as planting of rubber in an area where rubber was never planted before. Usually, this area is jungle land which is suitable for agriculture and where useful timber had been extracted. The land could also have been planted with other crops and is now undergoing agricultural diversification. Individual new plantings for smallholders are almost non-existent today, except in isolated cases of pocket land alienation. Most of the new plantings are carried out in large scale by the government development agencies. Financial resources for such development come from Government grants, commercial financial institutions, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. Replanting is defined as planting of rubber in an area already planted with the same crop with the aim of replacing the old uneconomic trees with high quality planting materials. In 1951, the Government initiated a replanting scheme to rehabilitate uneconomic rubber areas. The scheme is financed by a special cess collected from rubber exported; currently at 9.92 sen per kilogramme, plus a special Government grant. The implementing agency for this project is RISDA. Smallholdings are normally replanted individually, but now RISDA prefers them to be grouped in block basis with good and efficient management back-up to ensure greater rate of success. WORK OPERATIONS Plantation development work operations are numerous, from the major to the minor ones. As there are two types of rubber planting, their field operations also differ, especially in the land clearing work. 97 New planting. For new planting, the following work operations are normally required to be carried out: • Constructing drainage (if necessary) • Underbrushing of ground vegetation • Felling of jungle trees by chainsaw cutting or by bulldozing • Drying of felled timber • Burning - primary burning • Pruning and stacking • Burning - secondary burning • Constructing agricultural road (if necessary) • Tilling (if necessary) • Field lining - straight or contour • Terracing (if necessary) • Establishing legume cover crops • Holing • Perimeter fencing (if necessary) • Transplanting of polybag rubber planting materials Replanting. For replanting, the following work operations are normally required: • Underbrushing or blanket chemical spraying of ground vegetation • Felling of old rubber stand by chainsaw cutting and poisoning of stumps Or • Poisoning old rubber stand to facilitate rotting Or • Felling (uprooting) of old rubber stand by bulldozing or mechanical winching • Removing felled rubberwood Or • Drying of felled rubberwood • Burning - primary burning • Pruning and stacking • Burning - secondary burning • Constructing drainage (if necessary) or servicing existing drainage system • Constructing agricultural roads (if required) or servicing existing ones • Tilling (if necessary) 98 • Field lining - straight or contour • Terracing (if necessary) or servicing existing ones • Establishing legume cover crops • Holing • Perimeter fencing (if necessary) • Transplanting of polybag planting materials Work Schedule In plantation development, it is most important to draw up a work programme, showing the works to be carried out and the times for their completion (Tables 4.1 and 4.2). This is because all land preparations must be completed before the main rainfall season begins, when it is most suitable to carry out transplanting of rubber. The main rainfall season in Peninsular Malaysia is usually from October to December. This may differ from state to state by a month either earlier or later. Development Cost The development costs for new planting and replanting are almost the same. Perhaps, the initial land clearing for the new planting may be higher as it involves the clearing of thick vegetation, whereas in a replanting, only some 300 old rubber trees per hectare have to be dealt with. Moreover, a replanting can obtain additional income from the sale of rubber timber, which is in great demand these days, thus reducing further its development cost. Other aspects of field operations that can increase the development cost are terracing and drainage. Plantation development cost, from land clearing to crop maturity, are detailed in Tables 4.3 and 4.4. Land Clearing All living plants need enough nutrients, water, air, sunlight and space in order to survive and grow vigorously. These also apply to crops such as rubber. Other forms of vegetation around them pose as competitors. The lesser the competitors, the better will be the growth of the planted crops. Therefore, for plantation development, jungle and old rubber areas must be cleared of all vegetations, before planting is carried out. Some of the existing vegetations, especially old rubber trees, may have been hosts to root disease fungus. Therefore, removing them first may help eliminate or reduce root disease in young plantings later on. Again, cleared and cleaned areas facilitate land preparation work such as lining, terracing, holing and planting. 99 TABLE 4.1 SAMPLE WORK SCEHEDULE FOR 2,000 HA NEW PLANTING Work operation Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Demarcating block Underbrushing, felling and drying Burning - Primary Pruning, stacking and reburning Constructing drainage Constructing roads and terracing Holing and fencing Establishing legume covers Transplanting rubber TABLE 4.2 SAMPLE WORK SCHEDULE FOR 50 HA REPLANTING* Work operation Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Bulldozing and removing timber Burning of left-over debris Servicing of old road Lining and terracing Holing Establishing legume cover crops Transplanting polybag materials *A hilly area at RRIES, Sungai Buloh (1990) that needs 10% terracing TABLE 4.3 RUBBER NEW PLANTING COST (RM/HA)* Work Operation Year Total % 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Land Clearing 720.00 180.00 900.00 6.0 Terracing@500m/ha 600.00 125.00 725.00 4.9 Lining and holing 510.00 510.00 3.4 Planting and maintenance of legume covers 600.00 100.00 700.00 4.7 Planting materials 1,215.00 1,215.00 8.1 Planting labour (inclusive transport) 540.00 540.00 3.6 Replacement 121.50 36.50 36.50 194.50 1.3 Weeding 416.00 333.00 187.00 187.00 104.00 104.00 1,331.00 8.9 Manuring 606.00 819.00 716.00 1,050.00 1,040.00 1,040.00 5,271.00 35.3 Disease and pest control 60.00 40.00 80.00 70.00 20.00 20.00 290.00 1.9 Pruning/census/thinning 335.00 70.00 70.00 35.00 510.00 3.4 Roads and bridges 450.00 350.00 100.00 70.00 50.00 100.00 120.00 1,240.00 8.3 Drainage@10m/ha 30.00 30.00 5.00 40.00 10.00 115.00 0.8 Proportion of general charges (supervision/sundry expenses/other costs) 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 1,400.00 9.4 Total 4,986.50 2,103.50 1,868.50 1,363.00 1,637.00 1,499.00 1,484.00 14,941.50 100.0 Note : 1.450 trees/ha 2. Chemical and Fertilizer price as at January 2009 3. Terracing@40% of total area. Table 4.4 RUBBER REPLANTING COST (RM/HA)* Work Operation Year Total % 0 1 2 3 4 5 Land Clearing 600.00 600.00 5.1 Reterracing 180.00 100.00 280.00 2.4 Lining and holing 480.00 480.00 4.1 Planting and maintenance of legume covers 600.00 100.00 700.00 5.9 Planting materials 1,215.00 1,215.00 10.3 Planting labour (transport included) 540.00 540.00 4.6 Replacement 121.50 36.45 36.45 194.40 1.6 Manuring 606.00 819.00 716.00 1,050.00 1,040.00 4,231.00 35.8 Weed control 416.00 333.00 187.00 187.00 104.00 1,227.00 10.4 Disease and pest control 60.00 40.00 80.00 70.00 20.00 270.00 2.3 Pruning/census/thinning 45.00 45.00 60.00 10.00 10.00 170.00 1.4 Roads and bridges maintenance 240.00 60.00 60.00 50.00 50.00 120.00 580.00 4.9 Drainage maintenance 30.00 30.00 5.00 40.00 10.00 115.00 1.0 Proportion of general charges (sundry expenditure/ supervision/ other costs) 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 1,200.00 10.2 Total 4,206.50 1,653.45 1,538.45 1,333.00 1,577.00 1,494.00 11,802.40 100.0 Note : 1.450 trees/ha 2. Chemical and Fertilizer price as at January 2009 Clearing of Jungle Land Jungle clearing (Figure 4.1(a)) is carried out either by manual felling or mechanical uprooting. These are described below. Manual felling. First of all, the area to be cleared is demarcated. A rentis of 2 mm width is cut around the boundary. For a very large area, it is advisable to divide it into smaller blocks of, say 40-80 hectares. Clearing work is then done block by block to facilitate supervision, in which case, each block is clearly demarcated by such rentice as mentioned earlier. Underbrushing is done to all ground vegetation. They are spread at the same thickness on the ground to help in the burning process later on. Jungle trees are then felled by chainsaw. The height of cutting varies from 15 cm to the buttress, depending on the size of the trunk. The trees should be felled in one direction to facilitate burning. Felling trees across roads, ravines, and swamps must be avoided. Usually a group of four to five trees close together is felled, the largest of them chosen as the kingpin. Wedge-shaped cuts are made on one side of the rest of the trees in the group facing the direction to be felled. Then a complete cut is made to the kingpin, and when it falls, it knocks down the rest of the trees in the group. Large branches are pruned off to create a compact condition of the felled timber and to facilitate good burning. The trunks of felled timber are cut into two or three pieces. It is always advisable to create a fire belt of 20-40 m wide around the area. Trees in the fire belt are left standing to act as fire breakers. Such belt is felled and burnt when the inner area has been completely cleared and burnt. Burning can be carried out as soon as the felled timber is dry. This takes about two months. However, there should be no rain within three to four days prior to burning. Ten fire points are required for every hectare and they should be placed at the edge of the area to be burnt so that the direction of burning is from outside towards the inside and finally to the centre. Suitable materials for fire starters should be used. Burning should preferably start at noon when conditions are dry. Every precaution must be taken with regards to safety. Pruning of the smaller unburnt logs, stacking and reburning them can be carried out as soon as the burnt area is safe enough to enter (Figure 4.1(b)). However, it must be emphasised here that open burning of jungle land for conversion to agriculture land requires a licence from the Department of the Environment (DOE) under Section 22(1) of the Environmental Quality Act 1974. Mechanical clearing. As mentioned earlier, new plantings are mostly done on large scales with the aid of machinery to complete the operation on time. Bulldozers are used to push down and uproot jungle trees which are then piled in wind-rows at intervals of some 10-20 metres. They are later burnt when adequately dry, and the 103 same procedure described earlier is applied. When using this method, underbrushing of ground vegetation is normally not done, as it will be destroyed along with the felled timber. (a) Jungle area before clearing (b) Cleared jungle land ready for rubber cultivation Figure 4.1 Manually-cleared jungle area for rubber cultivation Clearing Old Rubber Area There are three options for clearing old rubber areas for replanting. These are manual felling, mechanical uprooting and poisoning. The details are given below. Manual felling. As usual, underbrushing of ground vegetation is done first. The old rubber trees are felled by chainsaw in one direction. Felling across roads, streams and swamps must be avoided. Large branches are pruned off and the trunks shortened into two or three logs. The cut surfaces on the stumps are painted with creosote to prevent root disease spore colonisation, while around the stumps, arboricide such as Trichlopyr (Garlon 250) at 5% concentration in kerosene or diesel, is applied to hasten decay (Figure 4.2). The timber logs are either taken out for commercial use or left to dry and burnt. Drying of rubber timber takes only about one month and the same burning technique described for jungle clearing is applicable. 104 Mechanical felling. Old rubber trees can be uprooted by bulldozer or backhoe or even by lorry-mounted winch (Figure 4.2). The large branches are pruned off and the trunks are cut into logs. The logs are either taken out for other uses or pushed in wind­ rows to dry and later burnt. A bulldozer is able to uproot approximately 1,200-2,000 trees a day. (b) Uprooting by lorry-mounted winch (c) Felled rubber trees stacked in wind-rows Figure 4.2 Clearing old rubber area for replanting 105 In the case of replanting, open burnings are allowed only on felled tree stumps that cannot be used or recycled for any other purposes. However, efforts must be made to reduce the quantity of materials to be burnt. The nearest DOE office must first be informed of such activities. It must be emphasised here that where possible, the concept of zero burning must be practised. (a) After the valuable rubberwood has been (b) Gradual rotting and decomposition continued recovered, the remaining debris is stacked after transplanting and allowed to decompose naturally Figure 4.3 Zero burning replanting Poisoning. Old rubber trees can be destroyed by poisoning with suitable arboricide such as Trichlopyr (Garlon 250). A 5% concentration is prepared by diluting Garlon 250 in four parts of kerosene or diesel. The part of the tree that is to be treated must be cleaned of rubber scraps and flaking bark. The arboricide is sprayed or brushed evenly over the bark on a band of 40-cm width around the base of the tree. The tree will be killed in about 18 months. One litre of the diluted chemical is sufficient to treat five trees. The trees are left to rot gradually (Figure 4.3). The ground vegetation (weeds) should be given a blanket spray of suitable herbicides. The rest of the field work operations can start as soon as the ground vegetation withers. This technique offers the following advantages. • Zero burning is practised • Very useful in areas where the rubber timber cannot be taken out for downstream usage • Root disease incidence can be eliminated or reduced • Carrying out land preparation work under shade is more comfortable • Soil erosion is very much reduced • Soil fertility is maintained or even enhanced from the decayed biomass • Growth of rubber can be enhanced and early maturity expected • Cost of plantation development can be reduced to a certain extent 106 Drainage All living plants need water to survive. However, excess water limits aeration in the soil and upsets the breathing of roots. This can affect growth, and if this condition is prolonged, death of young plants can occur. Drainage can, therefore, be defined as draining or removing excess water in the soil. It is transferred to another area or lowered deep into the soil, or both. Objectives of Drainage Drainage is essential in the rubber plantation. Its objectives are to: • remove excess water in the soil • ensure that the soil water table is not less than 100 cm from surface • ensure there is sufficient water in the soil for crop usage • enable plants to obtain sufficient soil air • maintain healthy growth of crops • increase crop yield (Table 4.5) • prevent diseases connected with stagnant water condition of soil TABLE 4.5 EFFECT OF DRAINAGE ON YIELD OF CLONE PB 86 ON SELANGOR SERIES SOIL Depth of drain (cm) Year of planting Average cumulative yield from second to seventh year (kg/ha) 50 1957/1958 5,825 100 1957/1958 7,155 Construction of Drains There are two types of soil that need drainage - soil with high water table such as the coastal clay and inland soils, which are not permeable and cause water to stagnate, such as Batu Anam series. In order to determine whether a particular area needs drainage, a hole is dug in the soil and the water table is measured. A well-drained soil has no water up to 100 cm from the surface. Sometimes, it is difficult to determine this during dry weather. If the soil is of bluish grey to greenish grey, it shows that it needs drainage. Signs of rust or mottling in the soil indicate that the water table has risen to that level during rainy season. If such mottling layer is found 20-30 cm of the soil surface, the area needs drainage. 107 The outlet, through which excess water is drained, must first be determined. This can be a river, stream or lake; if there are no outlets, one must be constructed at the lowest part of the area. Main drains of 150 cm deep are dug at 100-200 m intervals running in the direction of the outlet. This is followed by subsidiary drains 120 cm deep at intervals of 50 m running towards the main drains. Intermediate drains 100 cm deep are dug between the subsidiary drains, also running towards the main drains (Figure 4.4). To obtain a fast flow of water, all drains must have a drop of 30 cm for every 300 m length. Drains can be constructed by manual digging or by mechanical back-hoe. Table 4.6 gives the specifications of various types of drains mentioned above. Outlet Outlet Figure 4.4 Plan of plantation drainage TABLE 4.6 PLANTATION DRAIN SPECIFICATIONS Type of drain Top width (cm) Bottom width (cm) Depth (cm) Length per man-day (m) Main 150 100 150 5 Subsidiary 120 80 120 7 Intermediate 100 60 60 10 Maintenance of Drains Plantation drains must always be functional. This can be achieved by regular maintenance. Drains must be desilted to their original depths from time to time so that the water table is kept to minimum level. Drains must be cleared of weeds growing in them so that flow of water is not hindered and there is no overflow during heavy rainfall. 108 Plantation Roads Today, a road system, including those in the plantation, is an important part of the infrastructure. Movements of people, produces and vehicles must be fast enough so as to maintain all deliveries and schedules on time. A good road system is considered another sign of progress. Objectives of Road System in a Plantation The objectives of a well-planned and well-constructed plantation road system are to: • maximise the general efficiency of all activities undertaken by the plantation • facilitate communications • facilitate supervision of all field activities • facilitate transportation of people, goods and materials within the plantation and the outside connections • reduce travelling time within the plantation • reduce production cost of the plantation Categories of Plantation Road In large plantation companies, normally, there are three categories of roads. They are: • The main road - connecting the main or parent plantation or headquarters and the normal public road • Subsidiary road - connecting the headquarters with the various divisions • Minor road - connecting field blocks in the plantation with the headquarters. The above road categories do not always exist in all plantations. Sometimes, there are two categories and at other locations, only one, depending on the size of the plantation. For example, a small plantation will only have two categories of road - the main and the minor roads, while a 3-ha smallholding within a smallholding community may not have any road at all, as it does not need one. 109 Construction of Plantation Road In planning for road system in a plantation, care should be exercised in the economic aspects of its constructions and usage, ensuring at the same time, it gives maximum benefit. The main road is the most expensive one and must therefore be as short as possible. The others are constructed according to their suitability. As far as possible, roads passing through steep hills, ravines or swamps should be avoided. The steepness of the slope where a road is to be constructed should not exceed 1 in 30 or 2°. This is very critical, as most plantation roads only have gravel surfaces and therefore are easily eroded. All corners must be wide enough for maximum safety. On hilly terraced areas, roads must be made to cut as many terraces as possible to facilitate collection and transportation of crops such as latex. The width of plantation road should be 4-7 m and its total length per hectare is approximately 25 m for flat and 75 m for hilly areas. Road surfaces must be strong enough to support vehicles running on them. Laterite soil or sand is used as dumpings for road surfaces, which must have a thickness of 15 cm after pressing and in two layers. If the roads are going to be frequently used by vehicles such as tankers, stronger dumping material, for example, granite must be used and they must be pressed several times to obtain even and smooth surfaces. Road surfaces must always be dry. Drains along both sides must be constructed at reasonable depth to channel off water from the road surfaces. There must also be outlets for the drained water. Road surfaces must be constructed cambered towards the centre at 1 in 30 or 2°, so that surface water can be quickly drained to the sides (Figure 4.5). Laterite roads can easily be destroyed by water. In order to overcome this, bitumen is poured over them, in which case, the laterite layer below them should not contain more than 30% clay to avoid too much water being retained in the soil. I Road shoulder Side drain 1 . 1 "4-7 m * 60 cm 60 cm Figure 4.5 Cambered road surface 110 Road Maintenance Roads must always have good surfaces. From time to time, they should be graded and pressed. This must be carried out when the surfaces are slightly moist. The cambered condition of road surfaces must always be maintained. Potholes in bitumen-surfaced roads must be patched up as they appear. The side drains must be regularly serviced. RUBBER PLANTING DESIGN Rubber planting requires a design or arrangement to portray rubber as a plantation crop. Well-arranged planted crops facilitate the task of locating and monitoring them when required, while at the same time they are pleasant to look at. A design is also required to determine whether the plantation is intended for other usage such as mixed or inter-croppings. A planting design consists of three components - crop density, planting distance and purpose it is intended for. From studies previously carried out by the RRIM, 1 ha is suitable for planting 400-500 rubber trees. For the purpose of balancing tapping cost and yield, as in the estates sector, up to 400 trees can be planted, while in the smallholdings sector where tapping cost is of no importance, up to 500 trees per hectare can be planted. These trees are spread evenly over the 1 ha area, and by arranging them in a well-planned design, the above objectives can be achieved. Thus, planting distances can be designed to provide such densities. There are several to choose from, and each depends on its purpose. Whatever the design chosen, the rule is that the distance between trees should not be closer than 2 m, except for experimental purposes. Table 4.7 provides several planting designs with various planting distances to achieve a density of 400-500 per hectare and a summary of their purposes. However, it should be noted that, for the hilly areas, only avenue-shaped design is recommended. This is because, on hilly areas terracing is required, and where possible, such heavy work operations should be kept to the minimum. Again, as trees grow bigger and taller, closer inter-rows may cause over-crowded conditions for trees in the lower and upper terraces. If the planting distances are known, planting densities per hectare can be calculated by using the formula shown overleaf. 111 TABLE 4.7 RUBBER PLANTING DESIGN Design Inter- row distance (m) Inter- tree distance (m) Area per tree